Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Protagoras
The alternative would only have to be cheaper than oil right now, with the potential to be made more cheaply in the future. Then oil would have someone to compete with, and that benefits everyone. My $30 figure was a rough guess at what the final equilibrium price might be if oil actually had to compete with an alternative.

So I guess your fortune teller graphic is in order. :)
37 posted on 09/06/2006 12:53:22 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: mysterio
My $30 figure was a rough guess at what the final equilibrium price might be if oil actually had to compete with an alternative.

Nothing personal, but I don't think you have thought your scenario through.

Right now, there simply is nothing to compete with oil as an energy source. And a rise in the price of oil would only bring more oil recovery technology.

The break-though you dream of would have to be something completely new. And the higher price of energy would not bring it at a lower price than currently available, so no price benefit would accrue.

40 posted on 09/06/2006 1:06:20 PM PDT by Protagoras (Lay down with dogs, get up with fleas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson