Posted on 09/06/2006 9:09:54 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
Vote on Rumsfeld fizzling out in Senate
By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer 6 minutes ago
An effort by Senate Democrats to force a vote on whether Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld should stay on the job appeared to be fizzling out Wednesday. Republicans, calling the move a political stunt, promised to block an up-or-down vote on the measure and Democrats conceded there's not likely to be any vote whatsoever.
Sen. Barbara Boxer (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., on Tuesday said Democrats were drafting a nonbinding resolution "that would express a loss of confidence in the Bush administration's Iraq policy, including a loss of confidence in Secretary Rumsfeld."
But Boxer acknowledged that the Rumsfeld resolution could be struck down on a point of order since it is not germane to the pending legislation, the Pentagon spending bill. A Democratic leadership aide speaking on condition of anonymity said Democrats would not challenge the point of order.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., repeatedly supported Rumsfeld as he made the rounds of news shows Wednesday morning. Frist's chief of staff, Eric Ueland promised Republicans would kill the resolution through the procedural move.
"The American people want us to be safe and secure. They recognize it takes bold leadership," Frist said on NBC's "Today" show. "I strongly support Don Rumsfeld."
The GOP blocking tactics would prevent politically imperiled Republicans from having to vote to support the way President Bush and Rumsfeld have handled the war, which is increasingly unpopular with the public.
Some Republicans, such as John McCain, R-Ariz., have been sharply critical of Rumsfeld. And GOP candidates Tom Kean of New Jersey and Stephen Laffey of Rhode Island, who is giving Sen. Lincoln Chafee (news, bio, voting record) a very difficult race for renomination, have called for Rumsfeld's resignation.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
I was hoping the traitors would go on the record for firing the SecDef during wartime.
They are idiots and have no unified message/opinion on any agenda.
thanks
Let's pretend Barbara Boxer is swimming near a stingray....
Basement hearings coming soon.
It already did the job, had their propaganda arms all "reporting" this on the morning news.
They have already won this argument.
Maybe Bush's scheduled 1:45 talk had some threat against certain treasonous democrats in the draft version, and the dems got wind of it.
No guts, no glory...
The Sea Hag?
If they had, the Dems woulden't be scuttling :)
No grandstanding there. They have already conceded it will be struck down on a point of order.
Since a "no confidence" vote is a parlimentary procedure not recognized by the United States, the Democrats are apparently pretending this is France.
No, they never intending on having a vote, just wanted the publicity to poison the public.
And they got it as usual.
LOL. But I think we have a different opinion on just where it went :-)
If this is how you measure success, then the Dems always win. (except at the ballot box)
They are definitely trying. But I'm not worried :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.