Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Friedman bucks the pary line...
1 posted on 09/06/2006 4:55:15 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: PajamaTruthMafia; knews_hound; Grampa Dave; martin_fierro; Liz; norwaypinesavage; Mo1; onyx; ...

Ping


2 posted on 09/06/2006 4:56:03 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
After she said, with her characteristic uber-coyness, "Coming up: something new for the evening news, besides me..." my Cringe Level went right off the charts.

Now I know why I didn't watch. Cringe Level doesn't begin to describe what this show sounded like.

3 posted on 09/06/2006 4:59:48 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Katie was quite...chatty.


5 posted on 09/06/2006 5:14:22 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Vanna White could have turned the pages better.


6 posted on 09/06/2006 5:16:57 AM PDT by trustandobey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Columnist at CBS Marketwatch takes the first in house shot at Katie. Interesting.


9 posted on 09/06/2006 5:19:56 AM PDT by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
"Tom Freston's firing will make no difference to Viacom's future. Viacom's already struck the iceberg and this move is just re-arranging the deck chairs." Walter Abbott

Beautiful!!

11 posted on 09/06/2006 5:24:11 AM PDT by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Nice job on the comment.


12 posted on 09/06/2006 5:26:31 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

They just never learn


14 posted on 09/06/2006 5:30:26 AM PDT by Mo1 (Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
Didn't watch. Won't watch. Don't care.

Watched the Science channel. Some show about why certain planetoidal bodies in our solar system are no longer considered "planets" and all the confusion over a proper definition.

Some times, smart people can be REALLY dumb.

I had a much better time laughing at them than I would have with Kooky Katie...

15 posted on 09/06/2006 5:31:59 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Quam terribilis est haec hora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Thankfully, I didn't watch.


16 posted on 09/06/2006 5:33:25 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right! (There's a fine, fine line between a stoat and a sporkweasel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
Couric told the audience that she had agonized over what she would say at the close of her first broadcast (and went so far as to suggest that we viewers, perhaps, were agonizing about it with her at home).

In what might have appeared, at first, to be a clever idea, the final segment explored the nightly sign-off words of some illustrious news people. Then, it offered the images of mythical buffoon newsmen Ted Baxter (Ted Knight) and Ron Burgundy (Will Ferrell). That was nothing less than moronic.

Couric then invited the audience to write in and suggest an appropriate sign-off. "I know we'll have a lot of fun reading them," she smiled. (Watching on my office television set, I winced all over again.)

How about:

I'm Katie Couric, And I've Just been Fired.

17 posted on 09/06/2006 5:37:29 AM PDT by MrEdd (The easiest way to LIE with statistics is to use the average instead of the Median.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
  1. She has a "dippy" voice. Good for reading stories to 1st graders but not suitable for serious news.
  2. Interviewing a columnist, Tom Friedman, was different but different does not imply better (although the converse is true). His "weep"ing for the days when the world liked us was infantile. If we have to suffer thousands dead and trillions of dollars lost to get the "world" on our side I say: "No, thanks.".
  3. The political commentary as WWE was pointless. This is supposed to be a news program. The mud-wrestling takes place on opinion programs like LimpBall and "The Quacktor".
  4. Who the %^&* cares about Tom Cruise's kid. Really. (C)BS News has 22 minutes to inform us and they wasted time on that?
  5. Get a signoff line or don't get one but spare us the audience participation kubuki dance. Maybe "Courage" could be replaced by "Vacuity".

20 posted on 09/06/2006 5:57:50 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

I was wondering how bad she was going to bomb, considering that the CBS evening news is only watched by the 65-85 demographic.


21 posted on 09/06/2006 6:07:39 AM PDT by EricT. (SpecOps needs to paint the NYT building with a targeting laser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb; Milhous; MortMan; CGVet58; CasearianDaoist; headsonpikes; beyond the sea; E.G.C.; ...
I watched it, which is a "Man Bites Dog" story in its own right. Friedman remarks on some cringe-making moments, and in retrospect that's what they were. But I confess I hardly noticed since, to me at this point, the entire experience of watching broadcast journalism is just one big cringe.

When watching a play one suspends disbelief and pretends along with the actors that what is being portrayed is real. If the actors step out of character the suspension of disbelief is broken and the audience laughs. And when one watches a performance of the news, one pretends that the reporters are knowledgeable and objective. But in fact the reporters are "reporting" things FReepers already know, and they are consistently, predictably tendentious.

The fundamental fallacy of broadcast journalism is the assumption that broadcast journalism is important. The republic went on for a long time before broadcasting was instituted and even before radio transmission/reception was invented. And the fundamental fallacy of journalism in general is the conceit that journalists are objective when in fact the are full of themselves. We all are fullof ourselves, of course - but some of us make a serious effort to actually do useful things instead of merely second guessing those who do.

And the selective reporting of only the things which went wrong in particular ways is nothing but a second guess. Twenty times as many Americans are killed in traffic accidents as are killed in Iraq; the selection of the deaths in Iraq to the virtual exclusion of the routine slaughter on our highways is an obvious bias. There being no obvious way to spin those traffic deaths as an indictment of the Bush Administration.

Journalism is simply a particular lens through which an image of part of reality (and part fantasy) can be viewed. Journalism overemphasizes the importance of the recent and of the atypical and the negative. On any given day the predominant living human reality is that most of us get up in good health, work or do whatever else we planned to do, eat 3 square meals, and sleep in a comfortable bed. And on any given day our ancestors are still dead. That is the big picture - none of which makes the news.

Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate


22 posted on 09/06/2006 6:10:11 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
And then, in a moment that reflected her worst moments on "Today," she gushed about how Vanity Fair had obtained the exclusive photos of the most infamous recluse in the world

I'm reminded of the movie, "The Three Cabelleros" (Not the Disney cartoon), with Steve Martin, Chevy Chase, and Martin Short playing Lucky Day, Dusty Bottoms and Ned Nederlander.

Lucky Day: Reading telegram: "Three Amigos, Hollywood, California. You are very great. 100,000 pesos. Come to Santa Poco put on show, stop. The In-famous El Guapo."

Dusty Bottoms: What does that mean, in-famous?

Ned Nederlander: Oh, Dusty. In-famous is when you're MORE than famous. This man El Guapo, he's not just famous, he's IN-famous.

Lucky Day: 100,000 pesos to perform with this El Guapo, who's probably the biggest actor to come out of Mexico!

Dusty Bottoms: Wow, in-famous? In-famous?

28 posted on 09/06/2006 6:27:59 AM PDT by sportutegrl (A person is a person, no matter how small. (Dr. Seuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
I didn't bother watching. However, it seemed as though the biggest event was the unveiling of Cruise baby pictures. I can watch that kind of pap on Access Hollywood or Entertainment Tonight and get that news from better looking sources.

Minnillo and Menounos

29 posted on 09/06/2006 6:29:36 AM PDT by edpc (Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
I wonder who this evil conservative is:

"A READER RESPONDS (about my column Tuesday on the change at the top of Viacom): "Tom Freston's firing will make no difference to Viacom's future. Viacom's already struck the iceberg and this move is just re-arranging the deck chairs." -- Walter Abbott

35 posted on 09/06/2006 7:14:43 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic lies/wet dreams posing as news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
I think that CBS still hasn't figured out that Alvin Toffler's vision of de-massifying the media has become 2006 reality. With people getting their news through four different news channels on US cable/satellite TV and also using the public Internet to get news, the network evening news broadcast has become an increasingly obselete way to get news.
41 posted on 09/06/2006 7:30:42 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
Tom probably thought that Her Royal Perkiness acted like a peacock crowing or something.
Flathead: The peculiar Genius of Thomas L. Friedman

. . .

The usual ratio of Friedman criticism is 2:1, i.e., two human words to make sense of each single word of Friedmanese. Friedman is such a genius of literary incompetence that even his most innocent passages invite feature-length essays. I'll give you an example, drawn at random from The World Is Flat. On page 174, Friedman is describing a flight he took on Southwest Airlines from Baltimore to Hartford, Connecticut. (Friedman never forgets to name the company or the brand name; if he had written The Metamorphosis, Gregor Samsa would have awoken from uneasy dreams in a Sealy Posturepedic.) Here's what he says:

I stomped off, went through security, bought a Cinnabon, and glumly sat at the back of the B line, waiting to be herded on board so that I could hunt for space in the overhead bins

Forget the Cinnabon. Name me a herd animal that hunts. Name me one.

This would be a small thing were it not for the overall pattern. Thomas Friedman does not get these things right even by accident. It's not that he occasionally screws up and fails to make his metaphors and images agree. It's that he always screws it up. He has an anti-ear, and it's absolutely infallible; he is a Joyce or a Flaubert in reverse, incapable of rendering even the smallest details without genius. The difference between Friedman and an ordinary bad writer is that an ordinary bad writer will, say, call some businessman a shark and have him say some tired, uninspired piece of dialogue: Friedman will have him spout it. And that's guaranteed, every single time. He never misses.


46 posted on 09/06/2006 8:08:42 AM PDT by Milhous (Twixt truth and madness lies but a sliver of a stream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

My vote for Katie's signoff:

"Not detonating General Motors Pickups, I'm Katie Couric"


56 posted on 09/06/2006 11:34:33 AM PDT by frithguild (The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson