Skip to comments.
Response from the Chief of Staff Josh Bolten to a Democratic Letter
The White House ^
| 9/5/06
Posted on 09/05/2006 6:11:05 PM PDT by bnelson44
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
09/05/2006 6:11:07 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
To: bnelson44
Ouch! That is going to leave a mark.
2
posted on
09/05/2006 6:12:23 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Mediacrat - A leftwing editorialist who pretends to be an objective journalist.)
To: bnelson44
The major flaw in responding to Reid in a letter is the assumption that he can read.
3
posted on
09/05/2006 6:13:00 PM PDT
by
TommyDale
(Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
To: TommyDale
...and if he could read he wouldn't read it. He is only trying to make political points at the expense of our secutity.
To: TommyDale
5
posted on
09/05/2006 6:22:45 PM PDT
by
malia
("How do you get a ceasefire with terrorists"? John Bolton)
To: bnelson44
Reid blocked too many punches with his head. He is a complete blithering idiot and incapable of understanding Boltens letter. Maybe someone will read it to him
6
posted on
09/05/2006 6:28:40 PM PDT
by
baiamonte
To: bnelson44
Items 1, 2, 3 blah blah, and 4 MEANS"Kick you in the nuts!"
7
posted on
09/05/2006 6:28:59 PM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: bnelson44
A BTT. We've often complained on FR that the Dems were concentrating on vituperation and letting the policy cupboard go bare. How bare that turned out to be has surprised even a number of Democrat partisans who now question what it is, exactly, they're going to take into the election other than the opposition's policies renamed. That isn't going to do - Clinton managed it but he was an incumbent. Kerry tried it and failed.
They could have appealed to their moderate base and improved their image considerably by presenting the first three of these policies in a bipartisan format and essentially taking the issue off the table. But their lunatic fringe wants to turn the election into another 1972 anti-war jubilee. This course attempts to satisfy both and will end up satisfying neither.
To: baiamonte
Me thinks that the Rs are finally fighting back.
9
posted on
09/05/2006 6:33:42 PM PDT
by
bybybill
(`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
To: sam_paine
I think the Bolten letter had to have pop ups...or harry Reid could not read it..at least that is what his mommy said
To: Billthedrill
All the dems have is their "I hate Bush" rhetoric -- and Bush is NOT up for reelection.
11
posted on
09/05/2006 6:35:26 PM PDT
by
tioga
To: TommyDale
"The major flaw in responding to Reid in a letter is the assumption that he can read."
....I think any freeper would be honored to read it to him!
12
posted on
09/05/2006 6:37:07 PM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(My Son, My Soldier, My Hero..............)
To: Youngman442002
I think the Bolten letter had to have pop ups.Uh. Yer thinking of the Clinton Admin!?
13
posted on
09/05/2006 6:40:25 PM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: bnelson44
Does it bother you as it does me to see the title "Honorable" before the names on Mr. Reid's letter.
Honorable...not!
14
posted on
09/05/2006 6:41:03 PM PDT
by
freedom4me
("Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom."--Ben Franklin)
To: bnelson44
I don't have the pics for this, but---where was Rumsfeld on 9/11, and where was Reid?
(Hint: it won't surprise anybody.)
15
posted on
09/05/2006 6:55:28 PM PDT
by
Graymatter
(TV-free and clean for 3 years, 2 months.)
To: bnelson44
I think that the point of the democrat strategy is not so much as to overlook what we are currently doing, as to point to the letter at some later time, thump their chests, and say, "Look, its finally working now that they took our suggestions!" It takes a pretty uninformed electorate for them to be able to do this, but thats not a problem in this country at the present time.
To: bnelson44
A complete waste of a good ink pen. Why respond with rational, logic, concise explanations when they will only be twisted for propaganda.
An informed educated American public would have no need for this if not for the constant hate-mongering, political cynicism and contemptible evil of the leftyloser congresscritters.
17
posted on
09/05/2006 7:05:36 PM PDT
by
petertare
(!)
To: bnelson44
He should have sent a copy to Obama signed John Bolton.
18
posted on
09/05/2006 7:06:38 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: bnelson44
Now, if there were truly balance in the MSM, they would give equal time to this can of whup-ass Josh just opened on the dingy one.
This is so well thought out and well reasoned as opposed to the sloganeering of the traitorous left.
19
posted on
09/05/2006 7:08:52 PM PDT
by
lawnguy
(Give me some of your tots!!!)
To: Graymatter
where was Rumsfeld on 9/11Rumsfeld, not a young man on 9/11, was in the Pentagon. He ran toward the devastation. He tried to help people. It's the kind of person he is.
20
posted on
09/05/2006 7:20:55 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Goldwasser, Regev and Shalit, we are praying for you...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson