Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mission9
If you are a single issue voter, vote for Tom because he will see to it that your right to carry a gun in your car will not be abridged by your boss. If it comes down to Rod Smith vs. Crist, the NRA will back Rod.

Having endorsed Charlie in the primary, I know they won't revoke support in the general. At worst, they'll endorse both. But also knowing the platform of the democratic party in reference to guns and their track record voting in the state on the issue, I seriously doubt that Any dem will get their endorsement when it comes to any level executive office. They may endorse a RAT in a Congressional election like they did with Zell Miller of Georgia...that's strategy for a long term legislative goal at the federal level.

42 posted on 09/05/2006 6:14:35 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: ExSoldier

Gallagher is pro-life, and was endorsed by Dr. Dobson and the FL Right-to-Life.

Gallagher wants to drill offshore of Florida. Crist does not.

Gallagher wants to protect our borders, and is against amnesty for illegals.

In one of the debates, TOM GALLAGHER said he is AGAINST AMNESTY for illegal aliens and said that Florida's Sen.Immigration Bill S.2611 would cost $50 billion, and he against this bill and wants to protecting out borders.
TOM GALLAGHER said that his oppenent candidate CHARLIE CRIST is FOR AMNESTY & FOR Florida's Sen. Immigration BILL# S.2611 and said that CHARLIE CRIST claims it is not an amnesty bill because CRIST says that the Senate Bill is for EARNED LEGALIZATION (for illegal aliens).

Earned legalization = AMNESTY



WHAT THEY ARE SAYING ABOUT THE SENATE IMMIGRATION PLAN:

“The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006” (S.2611)…needs significant changes before it represents the comprehensive approach required to dramatically and permanently decrease illegal border crossing and unlawful presence in the United States…Deterrence is an essential component of security, but the Senate plan would undermine deterrence. Provisions in the bill provide for the “legalization” of individuals unlawfully present in the United States for over five years. This amounts to a grant of amnesty to millions.” (The Heritage Foundation "Senate Immigration Plan Fails to Deliver Comprehensive Border Security" by James Jay Carafano, 05/16/06)

Many conservatives are endorsing Gallagher for a reason.


47 posted on 09/05/2006 7:23:25 AM PDT by Sun (Hillary had a D-/F rating on immigration; now she wants to build a wall????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson