[BillyBoy]

>> Is California better off with Arnold or Angelides as governor? Vote accordingly. It is that simple. <<

California will continue to go downhill if either of them win because both candidates will foist more socialism and screw up the state more. A victory by either will mean a Democrat monopoly on the legislature for the foreseeable future and that the buisnesses won't "come back" while they're in office.

CT faces a simular sitution with Lieberman vs. Lamont, as does Illinois with Topinka vs. Blago. RI has a shot at preventing this if they replace Chafee with Laffey as the GOP nominee.

In effect, the general election in CA is idelogically like a primary election between two liberal Democrats with different personality styles. Might as well speculate whether the U.S. would be better off with Gore or Hillary as President.

[calcowgirl]

Might as well speculate whether the U.S. would be better off with Gore or Hillary as President.

That about sums it up. There simply is no good choice.

[L.N. Smithee]

In effect, the [gubernatorial] election in CA is ide[o]logically like a primary election between two liberal Democrats with different personality styles. Might as well speculate whether the U.S. would be better off with Gore or Hillary as President.

Thanks for that, Billy. It inspired me to change my tagline.