Posted on 09/03/2006 7:00:27 PM PDT by voletti
WASHINGTON: Ihsan Saadeddin is proud to be an American. But he's tired of having to prove it just because he's a Muslim too.
The Palestinian grocery store owner in Phoenix has called the United States home for 25 years and feels as American as the next guy. He met his wife in Arizona, sent his three children to public school and has a weakness for McDonald's.
But Saadeddin says the September 11 attacks were a tragic watershed which turned US Muslims from ordinary citizens into objects of suspicion and discrimination overnight.
He believes it is why he was questioned at the airport for 45 minutes last month and asked repeatedly if he supports terrorism.
"Being born in another country does not make me less American than the secretary of homeland security," Saadeddin said.
Estimates of the number of Muslim Americans vary between three and seven million, including Arabs, Iranians, South Asians, African Americans and many other communities.
News of domestic wiretapping, monitoring of mosques, immigration crackdowns, public support for racial profiling and bans on some Muslim scholars visiting the United States has made many Muslim Americans feel like targets of racism.
Imam Mohammad Ali Elahi from Dearborn Heights, Michigan, speaks for many when he complains that officials including President George W. Bush use terms such as "Islamo-fascism" to describe the militant threat. They say such terms are inflammatory and liken their faith to dictatorships.
"This type of thing really hurts," said Elahi, an Iranian-born Shi'ite religious leader.
Outreach efforts
US officials deny they unfairly target Muslim Americans and say community leaders have better access to top US officials than ever before. Outreach efforts include townhall meetings with law enforcement officers and training courses for officials by community members.
"It's obvious that Muslim Americans face civil rights challenges now that they never faced before," said Daniel Sutherland, who heads the civil rights and civil liberties office at the Department of Homeland Security.
"As the government, we need to engage better with Muslim Americans. And we're trying hard within our department and you'll see it with state and local governments," he said.
http://jihadwatch.org/
Khatami blames US policies for terrorism while speaking in Chicago
The "Azzam" Threat: A prelude to Future Jihad in America
Not all Muslim clerics are preaching hate and death to all non-Muslims. The Vatican may not stand for a priest preaching violence and death, but they sure didn't stand up for the sexually molested children who were preyed on by some of their priests. Should I judge EVERY Catholic because of the evil, sick, deeds done to children by those priests? No, of course not.
And again, not ALL Muslims believe what YOU believe when it comes to the interpretation and beliefs in the Koran.
I'm signing off now. Have a nice Labor Day.
Many believe that one of the core tenets of the religion demands that everyone must convert to the Islam religion and all infidels must be killed.
In effect, you view this opinion as propaganda. So the question is, "What are the facts?"
You can thank your gawd!
I might just want to live in peace and not hear about how many sausages you smoked or lightbulbs you poked, or the other blessings of "liberal civilization" that your kind tries to force on decent normal GOD fearing AMERICA loving citizens!
This imam needs to listen to the Mark Levin show, because Mark calls them by the exact RIGHT name: Islamo-NAZIS!!!
Agreed and was thinking exactly the same thing.
To prevent REAL habitual mistreatment of American muslims, the trick is to whine about it before it actually happens. That way people will become so fearful of accusations of discrimination, even justified complaints against American muslims will go non-reported, giving the enemy the upperhand, at least for a while.
We're Americans insist US Muslims.
Of course so was Albert Fish, Jeffrey Dahmer, Ed Gein.....
I've come to believe that the legend of the moderate muslim is just that, a legend. They either outright support the jihadis or turn a blind eye.
For very good reasons, because you have not heard any of them stand up publicly and distance themselves from their militants Islamo-NAZIS! Have you?
You have NOT heard anything on these lines from the muzzie clerics, except for total silence or whatever they are saying behind close doors and in their mosques!!!Hugh???
While it's off-topic, I'm curious to know a few comments by Christians which you deem "stupid"...and what provokes you to call some of them idiots.
I was baptized a Catholic when 3 weeks old BUT I take no offense to what you think. I'll only add that stupidity and idiocy have no religious, racial or national boundaries. So be careful that you don't single out Christians because then you lose your credibility. That's your choice. And mine is to remain a Christian. Shall we shake hands?
You are entirely missing the point.
Of course there are good people who are Muslims. It is to them that I address my remarks. The only way they can be good people is by being bad Muslims. The best of men are the worst of Muslims, while the worst of men are the best of Muslims. Why be a hypocrite?
Christianity on the other hand does not glorify its extremists, or its homicidal lunatics. It does not pay them stipends, or provide family support. Islam makes murder and mayhem, violence against women and children, and sexual perversion central to its belief system. Christianity does not.
Central to the Islamic belief system is a conviction that YOU are better off dead. Literally, dead.
That you many know nominal Muslims who don't seem to share that belief means one of two things: either you don't know that person well enough to have discerned their true beliefs, or that person has already slipped away from Islam. All I am saying is that those people should be honest about it and go all the way to freedom.
Since 9/11 the population of Muslims in my area has noticeably increased and I am very uncomfortable with it.
America used to wait until after the war was over before allowing those in whose country we are fighting to immigrate. NO longer. Not only don't we send home Muslims who aren't US citizens, we continue to allow them in as immigrants in even greater numbers in some cases.
Will someone please explain how that makes sense?
Re: "partiotic", I'm glad somebody found something to do with that typo. Thanks for the laugh!!!
Yet many, many U.S. Christians disagree.
Your position on Muslims living in America would seem to dovetail with your agreement of the churches which advocate charity towards Mexican illegals.
Take a look at the other side of the coin. If American pilots hijacked four airplanes and flew them into Middle Eastern buildings, one can only imagine what would befall any American in that region at the time.
Face the ugly facts, dammit! We can't even RELATE to their neanderthal culture!
Read their book.
You are arguing a losing proposition. You seem to think that Muslims are Baptists with a different book.
I dare say I know a LOT more about Muslims, and Islam than you do, having lived among them in their lands for years and years and years of my adult life.
This IS a war with Islam, ALL of Islam, and the fact that there are slacker Muslims (apparently the only kind you know) does not make your naive extrapolation valid.
The Mulsim wolrd TEEMS with devoted haters. They were here before we were (at least our generation) and they were most certainly here before the Bush administration. They are not amenable you, or your love ministrations.
They are amenable to the bullet, the knife and the bomb.
This is not a war between Islam the United States. Islam is at war with what they consider unbelief. Hindus, Christians, Bahais, Jews, atheists, Parsees, and animists are all in their gunsights. They are not interested in a permanent ceaasefire. They are consumed with the desire to win WORLDWIDE- and that means YOU dead or in a burka.
And you so-called moderate Muslim friends won't be able to help. You see how paralized they already are. Just wait.
When they have to make the choice to conform or die, they won't hesitate. Fear is a powerful driver.
Nor were the Germans in WWII all evil people, or the Japanese, or the Mongols, or the North Koreans.....ad nauseum.
It doesn't take a plurality of extremists to make life horrible for others, and since none of us have godlike powers of discernment, that means everyone in that troublemaking group will come under suspicion-until the bad actors are removed, permanently.
For example, in the good old USA, why does someone like Robert Spencer have to keep his personal information private? Why do they have extremely tight security when he speaks publically? Because the members of the ROP will try to kill him if they can. The same for any prominant critic of Islam. Do YOU know which of our fine American members of the ROP will try to carry out the murderous deed? Nope, neither do I, and neither does Mr. Spencer. Therefore, he must view ALL muslims with suspicion if he wishes to survive.
Too blindly assume good will on the part of a group that has shown its extreme hostility to the western world is foolish and suicidal.
Incidentally, I don't see that you've defended all Muslims here, just the ones who haven't resorted to violence. The rest of this post is directed to anyone who wishes to respond.
"Strike off their heads then, and strike off from them every finger tip." - Sura 8:12
Someone help me out here: Just where is the leverage for interpretation in a 'religious' quote like that? How do Muslims interpret a violent command in a peaceful way?
Still, if all Muslims interpreted the Koran literally, they each would have at least a few severed heads or fingers to their Islamic credit by now, which simply isn't the case. It is to their credit that, despite their teachings, the majority of them have not become killers.
Similarly, "an eye for an eye" may be interpreted as condoning violence - but we know it isn't carte blanche to seek revenge, interpretation being key.
So 'moderate' Muslims should explain how the Quran's calls for violence can be reconciled with a 'religion of peace'. It would help someone like me to understand, being no scholar of Islam myself. It may even force an examination of the value of the teachings.
Until then, I won't condemn non-violent Muslims, or the few brave ones who have spoken out. I do condemn the extremists, and the deafening silence of the Muslim majority. And unless Muslims provide some insights into interpretaton, I'll continue to doubt the validity of a religion that urges violence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.