To: jwalsh07
Embryo's are viable human organisms
That is not true. Not even a majority of embryos are viable.
jas3
360 posted on
09/05/2006 7:12:42 AM PDT by
jas3
To: jas3
It's not true to alchemists and assorted ideolgical moonbats. In science, it is a statement of fact. Embryo's are capable of living which is the defintition of viable. The defintition of viable is NOT 'will live'. The science is clear, real science that is.
To: jas3
Not even a majority of embryos are viable. The real question is:
How many cat embryos are viable human beings?
Answer: None.
363 posted on
09/05/2006 7:16:27 AM PDT by
syriacus
(Why wasn't each home in New Orleans required to have an inflatable life boat?)
To: jas3
And now back to my previous question.
Kangaroo or ostrich?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson