Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. NO LONGER REPRESENTS JUSTICE - RULES FOR LITTLE PEOPLE ONLY
Vanity | 3 September 2006

Posted on 09/03/2006 5:23:24 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

"Only little people pay taxes." Leona Helmsley said, didn't she? Well, that statement represents reality more than people realize. No, it's not just the taxes that are the issue. The overriding issue making so many people angry these days is the LACK of uniform justice in this country (and the world for that matter). Law after law is passed and who follows those laws?

The honest people try. The little people have to. I personally know that in almost all workplaces, people are chafing under oppressive management which sets attendance rules, policy, etc. that the employees are expected to follow to a tee or be terminated. Retail managers must follow explicit rules about markdowns, product placement, marketing (pro-gay quite often), dress code, etc.; teachers have to modify homework and tests for "special students", be VERY careful about what they say; no pocket knives (because the students can't have one); etc., bank employees have to change the way they deal with customers who deposit or handle large amounts of cash almost every day because the government is trying to track every $; police must handle lawbreakers with TLC and that is the tip of the iceberg for what they face and lawyers are standing over everyone's shoulder waiting to make a dollar on the slightest misstep anyone might make. Life is definitely unfair.

The irony of it all is that rule after rule is made and law-abiding citizens trying to hold on to a vestige of honesty are suffering under massive oppression. The very wealthy and the criminals, though, often enjoy loophole after loophole not available to the "little" people. As a matter of fact, criminals quite often don't follow ANY rule if no one is standing over them watching. It doesn't matter what regulation government passes, a criminal is not going to notice that a store is already closed before entering, the light is red, it is illegal to enter the nation without documentation, you're not allowed to sell that drug without a prescription, you're not supposed to sell THAT drug at all, girls under 18 are not suitable for sexual relations generally, sex with a woman without her consent is not generally allowed (Depends on the culture, doesn't it?), sex between men and boys is largely not tolerated, you're not supposed to take money from people by pointing a gun in their faces, you really shouldn't kill people from whom you've taken money if they give it up and plead for their lives, blah, blah, blah.

Where are we getting all of this? Well, moral collapse is the root cause -- people do not wish to turn to the source of good, that is God and His Word. But I digress. Lawyers have en masse contributed to all of this. They have come to see themselves as gods. They believe they can decide who should see justice and who should be exonerated. And, if it suits their purposes or the accused has enough money -- Presto! You receive your "Get out of Jail" card! Well, the nation slides down the slope as this continues and worsens daily.

We go to work. We are reprimanded for minor offenses. We watch the news. We see illegal aliens running the Mexican flag to the top of the pole on U.S. Federal property (Post Office) and nothing being done about it whereas if we, the citizen, were to vandalize one inch of Postal Property we would be arrested immediately. I wanted to argue about having been let go from the Postal Service for being too slow years ago when I worked for them and was told by the postmaster that if I showed up on the property again -- I would be arrested (and he couldn't even be nice when he said it). We see people chewed out and fired for policy violations at work while politicians hold huge sums of illicit cash right in their congressional offices. Homeowners would be reamed out by the codes officer if they let too many cars park in their yard while illegal aliens seem to have exclusive rights to neighborhood parking lots on their front lawns. I could go on forever listing the inequities and expect those reading this to add a few. The lack of justice IS one of the biggest problems facing the United States.

We have had to follow the rules for our entire lives. Now, we have classes of people who not only don't follow the rules, they're robbing, raping and killing us as they go along. I don't know what the overall solution is going to be but something's going to have to change. This simply can NOT continue. We have a vacuum of leadership and it will eventually be filled -- probably with a despot. I've said my piece and that will be it for a while. I suffer patiently remembering that God is not partial and has clearly stated that "Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; anotheruselessvanity; blahblahblah; evil; fall; gunnyg; hearhear; honesty; humour; justice; marines; righteousness; rules; usmc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last
To: tomzz

So you just want your tyrant, the one that agrees with your drug choices.

There is one common legal drug for which no overweening (side) effect has been found and that is caffeine.

Use all the drugs wou wish just don't expect the conservative to pay for your ills. Don't expect me to welcome you into my house or my community.


121 posted on 09/03/2006 11:43:12 AM PDT by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley

Bring it up to the school board. Elect people to the school board who vow to get rid of the school photographer if you feel that strongly about it. Run for school board yourself. Personally, I have bigger worries than the school selected photographer, but to each his own.


122 posted on 09/03/2006 11:48:22 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: dhuffman@awod.com

I don't do drugs and I strongly advise others not to do them. I simply get tired of spending good money on the idiot consequences of idiot laws.


123 posted on 09/03/2006 11:51:55 AM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Whoa, man- don't say that too loudly, I think that's what got us the Clintons...

Actually, I think it was the Perot-Bush split that got us those two.

124 posted on 09/03/2006 11:59:41 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Going partly violently to the thing 24-7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley
In fact, wasn't that exactly what they had rebelled against?

I believe that was a good part of it.

125 posted on 09/03/2006 12:09:08 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: tomzz

You missed the point. You read what you wanted and what you could argue. I didn't say that you did drugs. I did say that you were happy with a tyrant that YOU found agreeable.

I am not happy with a tyrant or with a thousand tyrant countrymen - villanous provincials.


126 posted on 09/03/2006 12:10:43 PM PDT by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Sender
If I die poor, it will be with a clear conscience and a nice pine box.

I don’t even need the pine box - but a clear conscience is priceless.

127 posted on 09/03/2006 12:10:51 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: verity
"U.S. NO LONGER REPRESENTS JUSTICE - RULES FOR LITTLE PEOPLE ONLY" We are a Nation of Laws - not Justice.

Le Affaire de Sandy Burger shows us there are two sets of laws?

128 posted on 09/03/2006 12:18:45 PM PDT by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father

Thought this "rant" and discussion might interest you.


129 posted on 09/03/2006 12:47:53 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Nice rant.

From your moniker, I'm sure you understand that it's better than some other alternatives. Chonburi 1962-1965.

130 posted on 09/03/2006 1:10:08 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: dpa5923
Many employers permit and even encourage associations of certain classes of people: racial and ethnic minorities and sexual perverts. However, whites and heterosexuals are denied this ability to associate. An association of blacks creates diversity; an association of whites do not. A Muslim association is an example of tolerance; a Baptist association is not.

Diversity has become synonymous with perversity.

131 posted on 09/03/2006 1:26:01 PM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Whoa, man- don't say that too loudly, I think that's what got us the Clintons...

And might get us again if we're not careful.

132 posted on 09/03/2006 1:33:49 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
"just the view from the cheap seats."

But you have proved that you have a clear and unobstructed view from those seats.

133 posted on 09/03/2006 1:58:10 PM PDT by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

There are way, way more cameras today at red lights than there are on the Mexican border.

Boy, I really feel safe about that!


134 posted on 09/03/2006 2:04:55 PM PDT by djf (Some people say we evolved. I say "Some did, some didn't!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dpa5923

I think you are wrong in a way.

If a bunch of people wanted to start a "Gay, Lesbian Task Force" at work, the employer would let them do it without a peep.

Because they know that if they argued about it, they would get sued.

But if you promote anything conservative at work, you face serious repercussions.
Doesn't sound very equal to me.


135 posted on 09/03/2006 2:08:57 PM PDT by djf (Some people say we evolved. I say "Some did, some didn't!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
How I know is really no one's business. Management can set just about any rule they wish. I don't have a problem with it. It's the lack of adherence to rules by some 30 million illegals & others that is bothering me. Oh, I have a grip. You don't have a clue how much of a grip I have and on what I have a grip.

Me thinks you should call your doctor and up your meds.

And if you keep gripping that, you'll go blind.

136 posted on 09/03/2006 3:17:35 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: gas0linealley

"I doubt that those who make up the top 5%, in terms of income, can honestly be called "wage earners"."


I am in the top 5% and certainly consider myself as a wage earner. Do you have any idea what the dollar figure is for 5%? For 2005, it was only $157,176. There were 5.7 million people who earned that income last year and many more households with combined incomes who did.

Let's not have class warfare.


137 posted on 09/03/2006 3:45:50 PM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

or Chuck Schumer...I think he has requested a white horse..


138 posted on 09/03/2006 3:50:11 PM PDT by aimee5291
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

"it was only $157,176."

Only?

Everything's relative, I guess.


139 posted on 09/03/2006 5:53:13 PM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: djf

No one said equal. My employer does not have to share the veiws of his employees equally.

Are you telling me if you owned your own business, you would provide equal access to employees that wanted to form a "Gay, Lesbian Task Force" as you would to a group that wanted to start a "Conservative Task Force"? Of course not, you would unfairly favor a conservative group. Since it is your business, more power to you. Free association means the right not to associate as well.

If you don't like what your employer freely associates with, suck it up or quit. Freepers do not get to force anyone to associate with us!


140 posted on 09/03/2006 6:24:00 PM PDT by dpa5923 (Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson