Posted on 09/02/2006 2:46:20 PM PDT by TaxachusettsMan
I noticed on the FBI website that this Adam guy has "Adam Pearlman" as an alias. My goodness. I wonder what the deal is with him. (I am saying this as the proud granddaughter of a Polish Jew.)
I see this is another of the so-called Muslim "invitations" - the prelude to attack. Same as the 18-page Unabomber invitation that Ahma-dinnerjacket sent to the President. I wonder why Mike Wallace didn't ask him about that.
According to a link from a Michelle Malkin column (see post # 8 in this thread) to a site called "Right Side Redux," "Adam" once described his fater as a "Moslem atheist" and his mother as Christian. Don't know where he'd pick up the name "Pearlman," but I'm guessing he may have tried to infiltrate some Jewish group(s) at one time.
I really hope we get to kill him someday.
Thanks - I have that link open but haven't read it.
These "invitations" are not accidentally named. I take this quite seriously. As Mark Twain said, "History doesn't repeat itself ... but it rhymes."
Misguided ways? What you want me to put my wife in a sack, beat her with sticks, blow up the 7-11 because some of my neighbors go to a different mosque? Don't drink wine but grow opium to sell for my Imam to raise money to blow up his rivals in nieghboring countries? "Marry" six year olds? Kill the guy next door and "Marry" his wife for a week despite her objections, before divorcing her for my next conquest?
I suspect that Muslims are the misguided ones. But what do you expect from people who worship a Demon possesed prophet. I think Moslems need mirrors.
Uncle Ben .... is that you?
After a brief period of friendliness to Israel during the Begin years (and a brief period of flirtation with respectability during the Reagan years) the JBS has morphed back into the pre-WWII right wing, opposing everything they supported during the Cold War.
The Birchers have always insisted that all our conflicts were phony with the same "Insiders" controlling both sides, but they treated the conflict with Communism differently. Despite both sides being run by the Rockefellers, they supported the draft and US aid to anti-Communist insurgents. With the Nazis and moslems, however, they simply refuse to take part in any conflict since it's allegedly phony and controlled by the same people. So why did they treat the conflict with Communism so differently?
I think that what it comes down to is that despite its alleged non-anti-Semitism, they're opposed to any conflict in which Jews might benefit. Did they then support the "phony" war on Communism because they thought Communism was Jewish?
I used to be a Bircher, and my coordinator told me that there were high Birchers who did indeed believe that "the conspiracy" was Jewish. If you go to their web site you'll find that these people have taken the Society over. It's no different than the Liberty Lobby now.
Azzam the Bedwetter.
That idea was expressed when Iammadjohn sent the 14 page letter to Pres Bush a few months ago. Independent action seems to be the rule of the day in islamistville; they lack leadership aside from their Book and their Interpreters who seem to be anybody who wants to Interpret.
Gadahn had advance notice of 9/11 and posted this taunt on the MSNBC bbs the night before the attacks:
http://web.archive.org/web/20010911215029/bbs.msnbc.com/bbs/msnbc-world/posts/oc/738258.asp
The posted article confirms why I have forever rejected islam, because allah is another name for Satan and mo is simply a false prophet.
Praise to the REAL God of the Holy Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Amen
Remember what Joushua had said, that he and his household will serve the Lord.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.