To: GarySpFc
I thought we should nuke them until recently. One of my buddies helps design the Tomahawks, and he says we can easily take out Iran's nuclear capability with the latest Tomahawks.
That may well be true however only utilizing Tomahawks to take out Iran's nuke program will only buy a little time, they will immediately begin to reconstruct, and in the interim we can expect any and every sort of Iranian-terrorist response worldwide.
Unfortunately, the nuke option is the ONLY option with Iran, because that rogue state is led by a pack of maniacs who desperately need an international b!tch-slapping and the humiliation that follows. They think they're so invincible that their sh*t doesn't stink.
They (and specifically that little runt Ahmadjihad) need to be utterly humiliated and their collective, figurative faces slammed into the dirt until they scream not "allah akbar" but "UNCLE!" (as in SAM!)
It is LONG overdue.
45 posted on
09/02/2006 9:38:29 AM PDT by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: mkjessup
Unfortunately, the nuke option is the ONLY option with Iran, because that rogue state is led by a pack of maniacs who desperately need an international b!tch-slapping and the humiliation that follows. They think they're so invincible that their sh*t doesn't stink.
I tend to agree, but there is something you are missing. Unfortunately, the fallout would contaminate a large portion of Pakistan and India.
58 posted on
09/02/2006 11:20:13 AM PDT by
GarySpFc
(Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson