Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Plamegate Hall of Shame
The Weekly Standard ^ | 09/11/2006, Volume 011, Issue 48 | Fred Barnes

Posted on 09/02/2006 7:23:23 AM PDT by Laverne

The rogues' gallery of those who acted badly in the CIA "leak" case turns out to be different from what the media led us to expect. Note that we put the word "leak" in quotation marks, because it's clear now there was no leak at all, just idle talk, and certainly no smear campaign against Joseph Wilson for criticizing President Bush's Iraq policy. It's as if a giant hoax were perpetrated on the country--by the media, by partisan opponents of the Bush administration, even by several Bush subordinates who betrayed the president and their White House colleagues. The hoax lingered for three years and is only now being fully exposed for what it was. Let's start at the top of the rogues' list:

* Richard Armitage, the deputy secretary of state under Colin Powell, was the first to reveal that Wilson's wife was a CIA employee. He blabbed carelessly to Bob Woodward of the Washington Post, then to columnist Robert Novak, who mentioned it in a July 2003 column. Armitage, after admitting this to the FBI in October 2003, stood by silently year after year as Vice President Cheney, Cheney's chief of staff Scooter Libby, Karl Rove, and other White House officials were blamed for what he had done, and President Bush suffered politically. Loyalty is not Armitage's strong suit.

* Colin Powell, Bush's friend and secretary of state in the first Bush term, knew what Armitage had done and never let on. He met with Bush countless times as the White House was being pummeled in the media and by Demo crats for outing a CIA agent to take revenge on her husband. Bush called publicly for the leaker to be identified. Powell knew the identity, but remained silent. Some friend.

* Patrick Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the "leak" case, was aware of the source of Novak's story when he began his still-ongoing investigation in December 2003. Yet finding that source was supposedly the object of his probe. Now working with a second grand jury, Fitzgerald surely knows the supposed conspiracy to defame Wilson is (and always was) a fantasy. Still he won't let go. Fitzgerald has proved once more why naming a special prosecutor is a colossal mistake.

* The Ashcroft Justice Department. Armitage brought his story to investigators after the CIA requested an investigation when the name of Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, appeared in Novak's column. So when the department decided weeks later to appoint a special prosecutor, it already knew who had "leaked" Plame's name. Attorney General John Ashcroft recused himself, leaving the decision to his deputy, James Comey. Rather than face a torrent of partisan recriminations for dropping the case, Comey passed the buck to Fitzgerald. There were no profiles in courage at Justice.

* Joseph Wilson, an ex-ambassador and National Security Council official in the Clinton and Bush I administrations, sparked the "leak" controversy in the first place by writing in the New York Times that Bush had lied in his 2003 State of the Union address about Saddam Hussein's seeking uranium in Africa for nuclear weapons. The CIA had sent Wilson to Niger in 2002 to check out precisely that point, and he claimed to have debunked it. Later, the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that nearly everything Wilson wrote or said about Bush, Cheney, Iraq, and his own trip to Africa was untrue. Wilson was a fraud. "It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously," the Washington Post editorialized sorrowfully last week.

* The media--especially the Washington Post and New York Times--relied heavily on Wilson's reckless and unfounded charges to wage journalistic jihad against the White House and Bush political adviser Karl Rove. Reporters and columnists, based on little more than Joe Wilson's harrumphing, bought the line that the White House "leaked" Plame's name to discredit her husband. In an editorial last January, the New York Times said the issue in the case "was whether the White House was using this information in an attempt to silence Mrs. Wilson's husband, a critic of the Iraq invasion, and in doing so violated a federal law against unmasking a covert operative." The paper's answer was yes.

So instead of Cheney or Rove or Libby, the perennial targets of media wrath, the Plamegate Hall of Shame consists of favorites of the Washington elite and the mainstream press. The reaction, therefore, has been zero outrage and minimal coverage. The appropriate step for the press would be to investigate and then report in detail how it got the story so wrong, just as the New York Times and other media did when they reported incorrectly that WMD were in Saddam's arsenal in Iraq. Don't hold your breath for this.

Not everyone got the story wrong. The Senate Intelligence Committee questioned Wilson under oath. It found that, contrary to his claims, his wife had indeed arranged for the CIA to send him to Niger in 2002. It found that his findings had not, contrary to Wilson's claim, circulated at the highest levels of the administration. And Bush's 16 words in the State of the Union to the effect that British intelligence believed Saddam had sought uranium in Africa--words Wilson insisted were fictitious--had been twice confirmed as true by none other than the British government.

Worse, Wilson failed in the single reason for his trip to Niger: to ferret out the truth about whether Iraq had sought uranium there. Wilson said no, dismissing a visit by Iraqis in 1999. But journalist Christopher Hitchens learned the trade mission was led by an important Iraqi nuclear diplomat. And uranium, of course, was the only thing Niger had to trade.

The fascination in Washington with the idea of a White House conspiracy to ruin Plame's career and punish Wilson never made sense. If there had been one, it had to be the most passive conspiracy in history. The suspected mastermind was Rove, the Bush political adviser. But all Rove did was to acknowledge off-handedly to two reporters that he'd heard that Wilson's wife, whose name he didn't know, was a CIA employee. And the two reporters were more likely to agree with Wilson about the war in Iraq than with the Bush administration. The conspiracy charge, the Post rightly concluded, was "untrue."

A few diehards in the media have tried to keep the conspiracy notion alive. Michael Isikoff of Newsweek asserts that what Armitage did and what Rove did were separate, and thus a White House smear campaign could still have gone on. Yes, but it didn't. Jeff Greenfield of CNN recalled a Post story in September 2003 that said "two top White House officials" had contacted six reporters "and disclosed the identity and occupation of Wilson's wife." But the Post itself has in effect repudiated this dubious story.

What's left to do? Fitzgerald, in decency, should terminate his probe immediately. And he should abandon the perjury prosecution of Libby, the former Cheney aide. Libby's foggy memory was no worse than that of Armitage, who forgot for two years to tell Fitzgerald he'd talked to the Post's Woodward but isn't being prosecuted. Last but not least, a few apologies are called for, notably by Powell and Armitage, but also by the press. A correction--perhaps the longest and most overdue in the history of journalism--is in order.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; colin; colinpowell; fitzygate; fredbarnes; plamebroiled; plamegate; powell; shamegate; wilsondone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
Yet another article; a good one by Fred.
1 posted on 09/02/2006 7:23:24 AM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Laverne
The Bush haters will never apologize, they'll defend to the end and move on to the next lie and misrepresentation in their goal to destroy this President and this country too.
2 posted on 09/02/2006 7:26:33 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

I hope no one will hold their breath for any truth-telling by the MSM. A cabal of hateful bastards, whose bilious opinions cannot be distilled from their craft ("journalism"), they deserve the extinction that continues to erode their corrupt and despicable trade.


3 posted on 09/02/2006 7:31:24 AM PDT by TheGeezer (I.will.never.vote.for.John.McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

--and the Administration will sit there, like a deer in the headlights----


4 posted on 09/02/2006 7:31:44 AM PDT by rellimpank (Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
"Joseph Wilson, an ex-ambassador and National Security Council official in the Clinton and Bush I administrations..."

Next job, men's room attendant.

5 posted on 09/02/2006 7:32:13 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

Yep. Nice summation of the asshats in this affair. That Powell and Armitage would stand silent and let the presstitutes and rats take down W during war is really hard to fathom. I hope Karma comes back to all of them, Big Time....


6 posted on 09/02/2006 7:32:18 AM PDT by eureka! (Heaven forbid the Rats get control of Congress and/or the Presidency any time soon....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
What's left to do? Fitzgerald, in decency, should terminate his probe immediately. And he should abandon the perjury prosecution of Libby, the former Cheney aide. Libby's foggy memory was no worse than that of Armitage, who forgot for two years to tell Fitzgerald he'd talked to the Post's Woodward but isn't being prosecuted. Last but not least, a few apologies are called for, notably by Powell and Armitage, but also by the press. A correction--perhaps the longest and most overdue in the history of journalism--is in order.

Yeah when pigs fly

7 posted on 09/02/2006 7:33:03 AM PDT by Pharmer (How am I supposed to rule the world when I surrounded by freakin liberal idiots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

bump to myself


8 posted on 09/02/2006 7:33:56 AM PDT by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Its not about the truth..its about the POWER...and unfortunatly the average Springer Shock TV watcher American only remembers the lie..the power of the press


9 posted on 09/02/2006 7:37:58 AM PDT by Youngman442002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
Next job, men's room attendant.

Where he'll have plenty of time to play with his coif.

10 posted on 09/02/2006 7:37:59 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
“It's as if a giant hoax were perpetrated on the country--by the media, by partisan opponents of the Bush administration, even by several Bush subordinates who betrayed the president and their White House colleagues.”

There ain't no IF about it... he just finally picked up on what I've suspected since the day I saw Matt Cooper give his stress-wrought presser 3 years ago. This whole deal was a SCAM... concocted by the same type of traitors that brought us the forged, Bush memos.

Whether it is spread far and wide of what actually was brought down on the administration... is a matter of conjecture. Truth is a guarded secret today... more than ever.

11 posted on 09/02/2006 7:40:17 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

I think the White House will let this play out for a while before they say anything. President Bush will not make a statement directly, perhaps something via Tony next week, when Tony returns from vacation. Right now this is still a low-level story it being labor day weekend and all. I would anticipate that Team Libby is doing something, or perhaps has already done so, regarding an official way to have the case dismissed due to prosecutorial misconduct (just guessing on this of course). The whole thing stinks, and I look forward to the announcement that charges are dropped and Libby will file a defamation of character lawsuit against Armitage, the media, etc. At least I sure hope so. What they collectively have done is beyond disgrace, but unfortunately not unexpected. The dems are low-lifes, and this whole story proves it.


12 posted on 09/02/2006 7:40:51 AM PDT by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

You can just see Fred read it over then sit back and do "The Arm Folding" he's teased about on Brit Hume's show !!


13 posted on 09/02/2006 7:41:00 AM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog
Here is Wilson's reply (via NR's Corner)
14 posted on 09/02/2006 7:41:11 AM PDT by Anthony Bruni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Anthony Bruni

bttt


15 posted on 09/02/2006 7:42:24 AM PDT by litehaus (What is the speed of dark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
Fred sums it up nicely, but as Rush said last week, the damage is done and the smeared reputations will remain smeared. And, once again, the Administration will do nothing about it.
16 posted on 09/02/2006 7:43:09 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat

Why is it never mentioned that Joe Wilson was part of the John Kerry presidential campaign? Didn't he have meetings with Kerry people before all of this hit the fan? There is more to this Joe Wilson effort to trash the president than being offended by outing his wife. Was it a planned attack to gain votes and trash the whitehouse? I am betting on it.


17 posted on 09/02/2006 7:43:17 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

Fitzgerald should be investigated for what he knew and when he knew it. He blew it!


18 posted on 09/02/2006 7:43:51 AM PDT by Revererdrv (G)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
It's as if a giant hoax were perpetrated on the country--by the media, by partisan opponents of the Bush administration, even by several Bush subordinates who betrayed the president and their White House colleagues.

Yes it's a good article but anyone who was paying attention knew this to be the case almost from Day One.

19 posted on 09/02/2006 7:43:56 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
Joseph Wilson..."It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously," the Washington Post editorialized sorrowfully last week.

Unfortunate? Nice summary of the last three years, and what does this say about the Post's brethren in the MSM?

20 posted on 09/02/2006 7:47:17 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson