Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/01/2006 12:30:29 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

I'm surprised tax law doesn't allow for burning at the stake for non-compliance (i.e., heresy)


2 posted on 09/01/2006 12:32:48 PM PDT by P.O.E. (What separates humans from the animals - animals don't use recipes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

My wages merely make me whole again, after the time I spent working for my employer and not for myself ...


3 posted on 09/01/2006 12:34:18 PM PDT by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Emotional Distress is a medical condition, psychologically speaking, so it should not be taxed, as to not induce MORE EMOTIONAL DISTRESS!........


8 posted on 09/01/2006 12:57:48 PM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

What can the government tax? Take the same question and put a 't after the word can and you get a more accurate sentence !!!


9 posted on 09/01/2006 12:59:37 PM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Sorry, but this reminds me of the old Monty Python sequence, with the blustering bureacrat who says "I think we should tax all foreigners living abroad," and the other bloke who proposes taxing "thingy . . . you know, 'thingy'."


11 posted on 09/01/2006 1:30:19 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D
Given the logic of the Murphy decision, it is quite possible that the risk-free, inflation-adjusted rate of interest could also be excluded from taxation on constitutional grounds. Following through on this logic consistently would revolutionize taxation and eventually lead to a pure consumption tax, which most modern economists favor.

Fair Tax ping.

12 posted on 09/01/2006 2:26:19 PM PDT by upchuck (Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
To economists, some portion of the interest we receive on our savings is merely compensation for loss — loss of the immediate enjoyment we would receive if we consumed our income today instead of saving it. Actually I think the "compensation for loss" is a lot more basic than forgoing enjoyment. It's compensation for the mandated use of Federal Reserve Notes in our banking system, with their disturbing habit of continually being worth less and less due to planned and managed inflation. The new Fed Chair has established a target inflation rate of 2%. Which he's not hitting right now.
14 posted on 09/01/2006 2:49:51 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson