1 posted on
09/01/2006 12:30:29 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I'm surprised tax law doesn't allow for burning at the stake for non-compliance (i.e., heresy)
2 posted on
09/01/2006 12:32:48 PM PDT by
P.O.E.
(What separates humans from the animals - animals don't use recipes.)
To: neverdem
My wages merely make me whole again, after the time I spent working for my employer and not for myself ...
3 posted on
09/01/2006 12:34:18 PM PDT by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: neverdem
Emotional Distress is a medical condition, psychologically speaking, so it should not be taxed, as to not induce MORE EMOTIONAL DISTRESS!........
8 posted on
09/01/2006 12:57:48 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Is Castro dead yet?........)
To: neverdem
What can the government tax? Take the same question and put a 't after the word can and you get a more accurate sentence !!!
9 posted on
09/01/2006 12:59:37 PM PDT by
Obie Wan
To: neverdem
Sorry, but this reminds me of the old Monty Python sequence, with the blustering bureacrat who says "I think we should tax all foreigners living abroad," and the other bloke who proposes taxing "thingy . . . you know, 'thingy'."
11 posted on
09/01/2006 1:30:19 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: Man50D
Given the logic of the Murphy decision, it is quite possible that the risk-free, inflation-adjusted rate of interest could also be excluded from taxation on constitutional grounds. Following through on this logic consistently would revolutionize taxation and eventually lead to a pure consumption tax, which most modern economists favor. Fair Tax ping.
12 posted on
09/01/2006 2:26:19 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
To: neverdem
To economists, some portion of the interest we receive on our savings is merely compensation for loss loss of the immediate enjoyment we would receive if we consumed our income today instead of saving it. Actually I think the "compensation for loss" is a lot more basic than forgoing enjoyment. It's compensation for the mandated use of Federal Reserve Notes in our banking system, with their disturbing habit of continually being worth less and less due to planned and managed inflation. The new Fed Chair has established a target inflation rate of 2%. Which he's not hitting right now.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson