Posted on 09/01/2006 5:58:53 AM PDT by SJackson
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.
also Keywords 2006israelwar or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
It should be titled "Jews Who Hate Jews." There have been many in history. Karl Marx comes to mind.
Noam Chomsky is the great scientist. The father of whole branches of modern mathematics.
If he critisizes Israel then maybe he should be listen. He won't say nothing unintellegent.
Accually whole this article sounds like a pasquinade on the ideological opponents. Some jews describe the policy of Israel as the ultra-nationalistic and against it.
Isn't Israel the national state for Jews with some discrimination toward non-jews? I heard lately that in Israel there no marriges between jews and nonjews. And non jews are berried on the different cemeteries then jews.
Israel is no different of other national states in the world. No surprise that some discrimination exsists there.
Bytheway the critics on Israel not always mean anti-semitism:).
That is the best summary of this form of insanity I have ever seen. Thanks for posting.
Ping!
It goes to show that betraying one's heritage can be equally satsfying with betraying one's country.
Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.
Chomsky is a linguist, not a mathematician.
And when he spews forth on subjects not related to his arcane area of specialization, he is no more qualified than any other ranting airball, including yourself.
NOam = No Am-erican....for nigh onto 40 damn years now?
Just out of curiosity, what branches of modern mathematics can you indentify that Noam Chomsky is the father of?
We've only had to read his works on linguistics.
We've pointed out on this forum for years that they should form an organization called Jews for the Destruction of Israel.
Chomsky is a semanticist- the kind of scholar who gives excuse to lying diplomats and lawyers. To call him a scientist is like calling Mengele a healer. Israel segregates itself because of centuries of pogrom all over Europe and dhimmitude in the Muslim areas. If they are to have an identity at all as the keepers of our traditions and relationship to God, they must keep separate. I can find fault with many things Israeli, such as their subsidized religious scholars who contribute little else to their society, but they have the same right to exist as Mexico, both in their sovreignty and their culture.
Chomsky says "..nothing unintelligent", everything evil.
Chomsky is not a great scientist. His work is great disrepute in his field because none of the three models he has presented work and he can show no evidence that they work.
The father of whole branches of modern mathematics.
Chomsky is not a mathematician. He is in the field of linguistics.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
If he critisizes Israel then maybe he should be listen.
Why? The fact that used to be considered a competent researcher in the field of linguistics doesn't mean he understands anything about ethics or history.
He won't say nothing unintellegent.
Chomsky says painfully stupid things every day. It's his signature.
Accually whole this article sounds like a pasquinade on the ideological opponents.
I'll give you a break, since your English is poor and you have no idea what the word "pasquinade" means. Here's a hint: if a piece contains actual quotes made by real people then it's not a pasquinade.
Some jews describe the policy of Israel as the ultra-nationalistic and against it.
We're not discussing those Jews. We're discussing Jews who hate the state of Israel and want to see it go.
Isn't Israel the national state for Jews with some discrimination toward non-jews?
All inhabitants of the State of Israel have the same civil rights under law. You are dead wrong.
I heard lately that in Israel there no marriges between jews and nonjews.
Then you're listening to idiots.
And non jews are berried on the different cemeteries then jews.
That's the case everywhere. In non-communist states where there is freedom of religion, people prefer to bury their dead among the dead of their own religion.
And privately-owned cemeteries can choose to bury or not bury whomever they want.
That's called freedom.
Israel is no different of other national states in the world.
Many national states are very different from one another. Iran is a national state and it has an evil, repressive, vicious government. Ireland is a national state and it has a decent, free and beneficial government. Israel is a national state like Ireland.
No surprise that some discrimination exsists there.
So why are you singling Israel out for abusive lies?
Bytheway the critics on Israel not always mean anti-semitism:).
If anyone is a critic of Israel in the sense of saying that Israel does not have the right to exist, then they are an anti-Semite by definition.
And you, my friend, are obviously an anti-Semite.
Actually -- in the speech/language/hearing world Chomsky's stuff is still discussed/debated regularly. There are a number of adherents to his beliefs and a number who believe that parts of his work is accurate when combined with other's work.
Whoa, did that make sense? *rereads*
It's really hard for me to sit and class and hear about him *laugh* It's a constant thing though. *shrug* But what I've seen at the University level is not a wholesale discounting of his linguistics work, but rather an association of Chomsky with the "language acquisition device."
More later, I'm tired :) hehe
If this article (and by extension, the book) was not meant to be written, it would have written itself.
I only wish the article would have gone beyond the world of international and American "intellectuals" by naming some names of those Israel-hating Jews among the political, business, mass media, entertainment and Hollyweird set.
Leni
Absolutely. But I understand that few professors of linguistics would describe themselves as "Chomskians" and even those that use his work use it piecemeal, in a critical fashion.
How is this any different from Liberals in America who continually support regimes that vow to destroy us?
Chumpsky's theories on language acquisition have been disproven. He's now married it seems to an Arab. He's got tenure and spends his time spouting off against Israel. Academia produces and hires more and more enemies of the West.
Alfred Lilienthal was once the darling of the conservative movement merely for being anti-Zionist. His two books What Price Israel? and There Goes the Middle East were published by Regnery, which today publishes pro-Israel books. I guess things really do change. There was a time I would never have believed it.
Unfortunately, some things never seem to change. The "palaeos" and John Birchers still worship at Lilienthal's altar (as far as I know, he is still alive though extremely old). Lilienthal was also a huge admirer of the accursed Yassir Arafat (mach shemo!). These are facts of which pro-Israel Fundamentalists are sadly ignorant (as was I at one time). And of course Jewish liberals still insist that their support of Israel is based on the same ideology that causes them to support Castro, gun control, and "gay rights." I'm afraid these things won't change until Mashiach comes.
Another left-wing British Jew, Mark Elf, draws a subtle distinction: "To be rid of an Arab presence is to engage in ethnic cleansing. To be rid of a Zionist presence is to be rid of those who would engage in, or excuse, ethnic cleansing."
Classic leftist host/guest dualism, like American lefties make for "Blacks and Hispanics." Of course, the "palaeos" who hate Blacks and Hispanics agree with these Jewish leftists because they believe "Zionism" is the cause of the "racial dilution" of "white America" (which the "Zionists" caused by putting Indians in the Western Hemisphere thousands of years ago and then importing Blacks in 1619). Therefore "muds" who kill Jews become the only "good muds."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.