To: onedoug
How did reproduction "evolve"?
Hint: It didn't.
A fascinating hypothesis. Tell me, what explanation do you have for reproduction, and what evidence have you to support the claim that reproduction did not "evolve"? Also, are you referring to sexual or asexual reproduction? If you refer to sexaul reprodution, are you speaking of such reproduction in general, or are you specifically referring to one form, such as that of placental mammals?
191 posted on
09/01/2006 7:03:09 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
It's simple, but so awfully complicated.
Reproduction had to have been built-in for biogenesis to succeed. There could be no "evolution" in that process for it had to succeed from the beginning, otherwise there would be no life. If evolution continued, it began from that point.
That's the simple part. The rest, I believe, is God.
I doubt we'll ever be able to solve biogenesis, because to know what precedes it would imply knowledge of death beyond simply knowing that it happens.
210 posted on
09/01/2006 8:38:57 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: Dimensio
Tell me, what explanation do you have for reproduction, and what evidence have you to support the claim that reproduction did not "evolve"? Eternal life is ZILLIONS of times easier to do than Reproduction.
Once alive, stay that way for ever.
How many times did life have to rise out off the soup - then die, until it said, "Damn! This is gettin' old! I want sum chillen!"
287 posted on
09/01/2006 1:19:51 PM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson