Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most Americans Agree with Evolution [new poll]
Angus Reid Consultants ^ | 01 September 2006 | Staff

Posted on 08/31/2006 7:42:01 PM PDT by PatrickHenry

More adults in the United States believe the theory of evolution is correct, according to a poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 51 per cent of respondents think that humans and other living things evolved over time, while 42 per cent say they existed in their present form since the beginning of time.

Charles Darwin’s "The Origin of Species" was first published in 1859. The book details the British naturalist’s theory that all organisms gradually evolve through the process of natural selection. Darwin’s views were antagonistic to creationism, the belief that a more powerful being or a deity created life.

In the United States, the debate on the topic accelerated after the 1925 Scopes trial, which tested a law that banned the teaching of evolution in Tennessee public schools. In 2004, Georgia’s Cobb County was at the centre of a controversy on whether science textbooks that explain evolutionary theory should include disclaimer stickers.

The theory of intelligent design suggests certain biological mechanisms are too complex to have developed without the involvement of a powerful force or intelligent being.

Last month, Austrian cardinal Christoph Schoenborn said the two views are not necessarily incompatible, declaring, "There is no conflict between science and religion, but a debate between a materialist interpretation of the results of science and a metaphysical philosophical interpretation. (...) The possibility that the Creator used evolution as a tool is completely acceptable for the Catholic faith."

Polling Data

Some people think that humans and other living things evolved over time. Others think that humans and other living things existed in their present form since the beginning of time. Which of these comes closest to your view?

Jul. 2006

Jul. 2005

Evolved over time

51%

48%

Existed in their present form
since the beginning of time

42%

42%

Don’t know / Refused

7%

10%

Source: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press Methodology: Telephone interviews with 2,003 American adults, conducted from Jul. 6 to Jul. 19, 2006. Margin of error is 3 per cent.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: believeinevolution; consensusscience; crevolist; genesis1; niceosity; thewordistruth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 501-502 next last
To: stands2reason
My father said that you have free will, but God knows what decision you'll make.

Suppose you make one decision, and change your mind at the last minute.

If your changing your mind was completely predictable, how could it be 'free will'?

361 posted on 09/01/2006 6:44:00 PM PDT by HayekRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael

They care more about what others think than their faith in God.

They need "proof" of God to show others so they won't feel so alone and unpopular.


362 posted on 09/01/2006 6:46:26 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet
What did you think the tree of life was? An apple?


363 posted on 09/01/2006 6:47:19 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Evolution is real, deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Is it your belief that the "image" of God is physical?


364 posted on 09/01/2006 6:49:50 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

Whose avatar are you talking about? If you want to talk avatars, mine is the ugliest.

You seriously need help.


365 posted on 09/01/2006 6:54:18 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: betty boop

I'd like to know why so many Christians think it's okay for their fellows to engage in bad behavior without admonishing...


366 posted on 09/01/2006 6:55:41 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

If a creo steals, it's the fault of the guy he stole from.


367 posted on 09/01/2006 6:57:48 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
If polls are a determinant of truth, how did the earth become so spherical after having been flat for so long?
368 posted on 09/01/2006 7:02:54 PM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Democrats don'tchaknow!


369 posted on 09/01/2006 7:13:00 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: HayekRocks

If I could see into the future and predict everything, would that stop you from having free will, even if I don't know you and never tell you anything about my predictions?


370 posted on 09/01/2006 7:25:30 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

indeed!


371 posted on 09/01/2006 7:49:59 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: HayekRocks

Appreciate you posting the links. I've printed out several pages for nightstand reading material. Newton is one of my favorites from Science History, but Feynman is the all-time favorite.


372 posted on 09/01/2006 8:10:45 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
f I could see into the future and predict everything, would that stop you from having free will, even if I don't know you and never tell you anything about my predictions?

Suppose you wrote it down before I did it. Then you showed me afterwards. Everything I did supposedly by my own choice was on the sheet. To what extent did I have a free choice?

373 posted on 09/01/2006 8:42:48 PM PDT by HayekRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: HayekRocks

Your concept of time is the problem, not the notion of free will.


374 posted on 09/01/2006 10:05:51 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: longshadow

well, House Bunnies have their uses, true.


375 posted on 09/01/2006 10:10:35 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: HayekRocks
Okay just for you, if you did not already know the answer.

Here is what the content looked like when and as I posted it.

Darwin Central Trolls
376 posted on 09/01/2006 10:12:27 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
My concept of time is just the ordinary, everyday one. If you have an extraordinary alternative, you probably need convincing reasons why we should prefer it.

By the way, I claim no originality for my argument. People hae been arguing this for 2500 years. An omniscient entity is pretty much incompatible wih the human self-image as free actors. If I ask you to pick a card from a deck, you do it, and it turns out I've written down which card it was - and assuming it isn't a trick - wouldn't you assume I'd someohow rigged for you to choose that card?

377 posted on 09/01/2006 10:17:48 PM PDT by HayekRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

In have no idea why you think this matters the least to me. I object to your posting pictures of defecating canids. I don't care about your vendatta against some website.


378 posted on 09/01/2006 10:19:57 PM PDT by HayekRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: ml1954; jennyp
Hey guys!! What happened to the 'RunningWolf' tribute thread at DarwinCentral?

http://forum.darwincentral.org/viewtopic.php?t=764

'Wolf never had an entire thread dedicated to him and now you made it private ;(
lmao lmao lmao lmao

'Wolf
379 posted on 09/01/2006 10:23:18 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: HayekRocks
chinese accent 'U a velly funny guy'
380 posted on 09/01/2006 10:30:56 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 501-502 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson