Oh, well, I guess according to Professor Mueller, we can all just relax and stop worrying about AQ. I'm sure relieved...
1 posted on
08/31/2006 6:22:34 PM PDT by
wittyone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: wittyone
"the evidence so far suggests that fears of the omnipotent terrorist
snip
may have been overblown, the threat presented within the United States by al Qaeda greatly exaggerated."
So what about the recent terror plot that was foiled? OK, that was from Britain but it involved planes flying to the US. I'm there were plenty of operatives in the US involved.
To: wittyone
3 posted on
08/31/2006 6:26:00 PM PDT by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: wittyone
Given the opportunity and means, they would kill every last one of us.
How can that possibly be "overblown?"
4 posted on
08/31/2006 6:26:03 PM PDT by
msnimje
(What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
To: wittyone
Thanks to President Bush taking the war "over there", the terrorists have been too busy just trying to survive to launch an attack over here. Of course, nobody ever gets credit for what they prevented, they only get the blame for what happens.
Had FDR taken out Adolph Hitler in 1936, he'd be remembered as a villain today and Hitler would be remembered as a martyr.
5 posted on
08/31/2006 6:26:21 PM PDT by
SamAdams76
(This Program is Morally Good)
To: wittyone
This Mueller guy is a noodle head. Yup, Islam just gave up and called it a day.
6 posted on
08/31/2006 6:26:35 PM PDT by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, thats how you sell clothing.)
To: wittyone
Is There Still a Terrorist Threat?
No, not according to the DNC Playbook.
10 posted on
08/31/2006 6:29:55 PM PDT by
ErnBatavia
(Meep Meep)
To: wittyone
Not that a single person other than me reading this thread is likely to do so, but I'd recommend people at least read the entire article before engaging the flamethrower or the barf-o-matic.
To: wittyone
Well hell then. Let's bring back box cutters on planes and invite the public in to help the crew fly the plane. /s
To: wittyone
He may be correct (unlikely), but the fact is that the stakes are so huge that even a small 20% probablility would be too much.
13 posted on
08/31/2006 6:32:15 PM PDT by
expatpat
To: wittyone
Given how one nut and his "helper" shut down D.C.'s Maryland and Virginia Suburbs with one rifle, guess what a bunch of suicide types could do in shopping malls, downtown streets, just with pistols or hunting rifles with scopes. (Remember the U. of Texas Tower?)
What could they do with simple industrial explosives, or even easy to obtain chemicals...like chlorine...or..........?
Doesn't have to be a fleet of 757s or nuclear weapons.
To: wittyone
Al Queda attacks on the U.S. are highly exaggerated.....they only happen every few years.
However, DUmocrats (terrorist enablers and appeasers) attack the country on a daily basis and are a higher threat to the nation.
15 posted on
08/31/2006 6:34:37 PM PDT by
RasterMaster
(Winning Islamic hearts and minds.........one bullet at a time!)
To: wittyone
We need the picture of the guy with his head up his ass like Prof. Mueller/
19 posted on
08/31/2006 6:39:19 PM PDT by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: All
"You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you." - Trotsky
20 posted on
08/31/2006 6:40:04 PM PDT by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: wittyone
Poor Bush. He's been too successful. The looney libs are like children. If they can't see it, it doesn't exist. Why wash one's hands before surgery? Bacteria can't be seen, so it must not exist, right? And what you see in a microscope is a hoax, just like the planes hitting the twin towers.
With reasoning ability like this, I am somewhat surprised this man can complete a bowel movement unassisted.
This is beyond pathetic. And even more disgusting is what this clown would be saying if we got hit. That'd Bush's fault, also.
With a liberal, it's: heads I win, tails you lose. Lot of blood on these appeaser's hands. And more coming.
21 posted on
08/31/2006 6:42:20 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
To: wittyone
No. Because according to the mouthpieces in the MSM, the only terrorists are Bush/Cheney/Rove/Rummy, and they only have a bit over 2 more years in power.
26 posted on
08/31/2006 6:50:12 PM PDT by
joonbug
To: wittyone
Oh good, I feel much better now. Those guys who were plotting and about to blow up 10 of our planes over the Atlantic were just joshing us. Maybe we are safe cause the democrats think they will win in November. They like the terrorists afterall, and those in the towers who died were all republicans I am sure.
31 posted on
08/31/2006 7:05:38 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(Leftists, the enemy within.)
To: wittyone
So according to this genius the last 19 terrorists living on american soil died on 9/11/2001? They were all that was left? Man, what is he smoking?
To: wittyone
Is There Still a Terrorist Threat?
yeah, until Nov. 8th?
34 posted on
08/31/2006 7:16:38 PM PDT by
WhiteGuy
(It's about the People Who Count the Votes................. - Wally O'Dell)
To: wittyone
Let's see, 14 badly injured or killed in San Francisco this week. Nope, no terrorist threat there! Relax. Have another beer. It's all a hoax.
35 posted on
08/31/2006 7:17:15 PM PDT by
hardworking
(Give Hitlery a chance so her puppy, Billy, and his playmates, can piddle in the Whitehouse again.)
To: wittyone
Hey, John! Here's some
remedial reading for New York Times subscribers. Gotta keep up...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson