Posted on 08/31/2006 7:40:22 AM PDT by Quilla
I wouldn't think twice about going native and slicing some throats if it came to that.
I don't dream, I know!
Interesting opinion. I have a fishing buddy that claims that if such a scenario happened, and the democrats did nothing, the peasants and pitchforks deal would be forthcoming. I think he is a sunny optimist.
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.
also Keywords 2006israelwar or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
I guess they have already forgotten WW1.
BTTT
Dear S, just want to say thanks for all you do to call these items to our attention. I really appreciate it.
Regardless of who is in power, there would be a response of the greatest magnitude. The citizenry would demand it.
There is no political correctness attached to a nuke.
I do not mean this as a threat, but as an urgent warning. I am trying to make you realize that youand your familiesare at the edge of a slope, a steep muddy slope that slides down irreversibly into an unthinkably horrible pit in which the people of Islam may ultimately perish.
----
I feel better already! Thanks for that brilliant post!
.
A superb piece. Thank you for posting it here.
Great doc.
Thanks.
I think if we are attacked like you described..there wouldn't be TIME for all of those things you think would happen to stop it...
Bush has the responsibility and the BUTTON>
Mark for later read.
Care to support your certitude with some piece of evidence? Anything? Because I on the other hand do have plenty of doubt. (And this is no flame, mind you.) When a dirty bomb is exploded in an American city by unknown hands or by stateless terrorists, who do you think our fearless leaders would target in retaliation? When sixteen of the nineteen 911 perps were Saudi nationals funded by the Saudi rich, what did we do except continue playing footsie with the 13,000 princes there?!
Interesting historical perspective and I see your point about Allah not always proving reliable as their "shield". Such misplaced trust has, in their past, lead to big mistakes as you stated. And probably will again in the future. As you said, those who do not learn...
However even if the jihadists don't receive the "protection factor" they expected, being killed is still not not a bad option. They believe they get that trip to paradise with all the generous perks. Besides, Islam is so hopelessly backward they have virtually no chance of catching up with an ever advancing western world. That was pretty much my point. Jihad is a way out. Either destroy the enemy or destroy yourself trying.
I really feel that the current nutjob of a president of IRAN probably gets his jollies everyday on that fantasy!!
In his little twisted mind warped in the bloody doctrine of Islam (The Religion of Peace), nothing will give him satisfaction (or probably orgasm) than to see hordes of people (preferably Americans, Christians & Jews) killed at the altar of Islam; if a couple million of his own people are needed to achieve this then he can easily spare them too.
Didn't Japan Nuke us first?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.