[libstripper]

Rummy really hit the target with that great speech!!

[N. Theknow]

LA Times desperately seeking to take itself out of the crosshairs of the Truthscope.

[Ouderkirk]

They just can't tolerate having their failings pointed out to them

[BerniesFriend]

They're almost always disproportionate.

Their is that word "disproportionate" again..funny how appeasers like that word..hmmmmm..

[IrishMike]

My man Rummy hit the ball out of the park.
Listen to the pigs squeal..........

"With the growing lethality and the increasing availability of weapons, can we truly afford to believe that somehow, some way, vicious extremists can be appeased?" Rumsfeld asked.

Rumsfeld said "any kind of moral or intellectual confusion about who and what is right or wrong can weaken the ability of free societies to persevere" in any long war.

[libstripper]

Here's a good companion piece (NOT a barfer) to go with the LAT editorial:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1692970/posts

[Sgt_Schultze]

The assumption was that, although Rumsfeld remained fireproof, his cocksure contempt for criticism...

Is the LATimes pot calling the kettle black? Here we have Rummy criticizing the anti-war crowd as appeasers and the LAT has a tantrum about Rummy not liking criticism. How do the editors react? They publish a hissyfit about how they have contempt for Rummy's criticism of them. He has called them out as apeasers and they don't like it so they lash back.

[laotzu]

the mantra of conservatives was "Let Reagan be Reagan."

Man. If I've heard that once, I've heard it.....wait.

I have never heard that.

[Old Student]

Y'all might want to FReep the poll down the page, here:

http://www.kfor.com/

[tkathy]

The dish it out but can't take it wussies are whining again.