Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DTogo

I saw it, too. Hackett was UGLY and Kasich was applying the 'shouldn't be name calling' remark to both guests. Kasich didn't handle it well, in my opinion.

Senor wasn't sure to whom Hackett was referring at first and was remarkably composed under the circumstances.

Stunning performance by Hackett.


11 posted on 08/30/2006 5:45:02 PM PDT by windchime (One war~many fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: windchime

I went ballistic and already emailed Kasich telling him he runs a lousy excuse for the Factor and that Hackett is a know-nothing. Senor was *unbelievably* composed, I would have blown a gasket at Hackett's pompous a**. The guy thinks because he had a look at the war up close and personal, and most of the rest of us haven't, we have no right to have an opinion.


22 posted on 08/30/2006 5:49:25 PM PDT by Felis_irritable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: windchime

"Kasich didn't handle it well, in my opinion."



No, he didn't. In fact, the more I listen to Kasich, the more I'm disappoined with him. Even before the debate began, Kasich was taking issue with those Republicans who were calling the Democrats appeasers...which they clearly are.


25 posted on 08/30/2006 5:50:40 PM PDT by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *sses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: windchime

Indeed, Kasich should have directed the "no name-calling" statement to Hackett. And then Kasich says "I'm no fan of the war, either" in passing... Lame.


32 posted on 08/30/2006 5:56:21 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: windchime

Kasich was EXTREMELY ineffectual, i think he was flustered and taken aback by the viciousness of the ad hominem attack, which was entirely unprovoked! they should have cut that jack@$$ Hackett's mic off when he started that crap. Say what you want about Bill, but i think he would have cut the mic and called Hackett out on that stuff.


37 posted on 08/30/2006 6:01:03 PM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: windchime

Kasich was doing his "I have to be impartial so I'll give the libs a free ride routine" I don't know who is worse, Kasich or Scarborough. Hackett was a complete JACKASS.


38 posted on 08/30/2006 6:01:14 PM PDT by az wildkitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: windchime
Kasich didn't handle it well, in my opinion

IMO, O'Reilly is unwatchable trash when Kasich sits in as host! He should have pulled the plug on Hackett after the first outburst! It was obvious that further input from him would be gibberish. I felt sorry for Dan Senor, having to sit there in the studio and take that trash talk.

Me? I'da walked off!

87 posted on 08/30/2006 7:59:37 PM PDT by Don Carlos (Me cache en los Moros. (Ancient Spanish curse))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: windchime

Kasich is so lame.


93 posted on 08/30/2006 8:31:43 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: windchime

Kasich is a wuss. He certainly is no conservative.


117 posted on 08/31/2006 4:45:43 AM PDT by sauropod (Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." PJO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: windchime

I don't bother watching Kasich, too bad Michelle Malkin or Laura Ingram don't fill in for O'Reilly.


118 posted on 08/31/2006 4:48:26 AM PDT by razzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson