Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Accidental Drug Trafficker
Reason ^ | August 30, 2006 | Jacob Sullum

Posted on 08/30/2006 1:36:43 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2006 1:36:44 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I think these prosecutors should be held to the same standard they think doctors should be held to.

That is to say, if they wrongfully prosecute an innocent man, regardless of whether or not they thought he was guilty, they should be convicted of wrongful prosecution and unlawful imprisonment and go to jail.

It's only fair.
2 posted on 08/30/2006 2:19:20 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

As long as the government can arbitrarily decide the quantity and type of substances doctors prescribe, then those doctors who are arrested for putting the needs of the patient above the needs of the politician are political prisoners.


3 posted on 08/30/2006 2:25:36 PM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity

Read later


4 posted on 08/30/2006 2:33:45 PM PDT by TruthNtegrity (What happened to "Able Danger" and any testimony by Col Schaffer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mugs99; monday

Good comments.


5 posted on 08/30/2006 2:34:55 PM PDT by L98Fiero (Evil is an exact science)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monday

Excellent point!

On the flip side, I'd like those responsible (parole boards, judges, psychiatrists who testify that someone is "no longer a threat") for releasing violent criminals back into society to be held responsible for subsequent criminal actions.


6 posted on 08/30/2006 3:09:00 PM PDT by generally (Ask me about FReepers Folding@Home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I'm about as anti-drug as a person can get, but if this article is accurate, I'll side with the doctor.

I generally avoid taking either prescription drugs or OTC stuff. I usually prefer to "gut it out," but if I or someone I loved was suffering from severe chronic pain, I'd want whatever relief was possible.

Punishing a doctor who in good faith provides that relief is itself a crime.


7 posted on 08/30/2006 3:12:52 PM PDT by generally (Ask me about FReepers Folding@Home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I am grateful that I do not suffer from any chronic pain.
I have such a low tolerance for "drugs" that I am unable to function in public on OTC antihistamines.
That status could change in an instant, due to disease or injury.
That said, I know two people who take large amounts of serious pain killing drugs, to enable them to merely endure the physical pain they constantly suffer.
I am also aware there are some physicians out there who "sell 'scripts" to drug abusers.
The prosecution in this case, as in seemingly endless others, overreached, and acted in a manner more suggestive of a witch hunt than of legal justice.
I'm glad they got smacked down.
8 posted on 08/30/2006 3:19:42 PM PDT by sarasmom (Lead, follow, or get out of the way .The "debate" ended on 91101 for serious adults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Care by the Hour

Hydrogen power system unveiled in Maine

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

9 posted on 08/30/2006 6:03:52 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

ping (this may be redundent story)


10 posted on 08/30/2006 8:05:39 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Amnesty_From_Government.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; Americanwolfsbrother; Annie03; ...
as someone on this thread suggested if the man is found not guilty at his second trial the persacuters should all go to jail for kidnapping and malicious prosecution

Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here

11 posted on 08/31/2006 12:24:30 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The doc was accused of a 1600 pill a day rx to one patient. I couldn't eat that many M&M's in a day. The pharmacist would have had to have a direct line to a poppy field in Afghanistan or sumfin. I think it's reasonable to ask for scientific evidence that a regimen is not vastly overprescribed, as one qualification of "good faith."


12 posted on 08/31/2006 12:35:45 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I think it's reasonable to ask for scientific evidence that a regimen is not vastly overprescribed, as one qualification of "good faith." ... and that the patient in fact was consuming it all himself or herself


13 posted on 08/31/2006 12:38:12 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Juries should note this. The judges and prosecutors will try to force them to decide the way they want them to. Ultimately, if injustice occurs, the jury will be blamed for the injustice.

As a juror, ignore the prosecution and the judge's instruction and determine whether you can live with your decision. It never ceases to amaze me when jurors who follow instructions from the prosecutor and judges and realize they are those demonized.

Do not give into the judicial process and vote your conscience based on knowing the consequences of your decision.
14 posted on 08/31/2006 12:41:40 AM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
The doc was accused of a 1600 pill a day rx to one patient.

Accused is the key word here. Based on what I have seen on this case I would have a hard time believing the sun rises in the East based on this prosecutor's antics. Their abuse of the entire judicial process makes them incredibly unworthy of any sort of credibility. Bottom line, these guys do not know how not to lie. Zero credibility as affirmed by the appeals court, which was outraged by this incredible abuse.
15 posted on 08/31/2006 12:50:18 AM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: microgood

this is why voir dire selects for sheeple


16 posted on 08/31/2006 1:21:41 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: microgood

well fine, so the defense will make the prosecution look like asses on a point like this if it's part of the "objective good faith" criterion. the gummint is so afraid of any objective standard, it can't bully its way around so much when there is a law spelling out concretely what is wrong and right.


17 posted on 08/31/2006 1:24:04 AM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: microgood
Accused is the key word here. Based on what I have seen on this case I would have a hard time believing the sun rises in the East based on this prosecutor's antics.

The appeals court judge didn't buy that one either!
.
18 posted on 08/31/2006 8:38:32 AM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone
I think it's reasonable to ask for scientific evidence that a regimen is not vastly overprescribed, as one qualification of "good faith."

Medical experts testified that he did not overprescribe... This is a case of government playing doctor.
.
19 posted on 08/31/2006 8:43:22 AM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The "War on Drugs" is doing more damage to society as a whole than the drugs do or would do in its absence.
20 posted on 08/31/2006 1:46:57 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson