Skip to comments.
The Accidental Drug Trafficker
Reason ^
| August 30, 2006
| Jacob Sullum
Posted on 08/30/2006 1:36:43 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
08/30/2006 1:36:44 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
I think these prosecutors should be held to the same standard they think doctors should be held to.
That is to say, if they wrongfully prosecute an innocent man, regardless of whether or not they thought he was guilty, they should be convicted of wrongful prosecution and unlawful imprisonment and go to jail.
It's only fair.
2
posted on
08/30/2006 2:19:20 PM PDT
by
monday
To: neverdem
As long as the government can arbitrarily decide the quantity and type of substances doctors prescribe, then those doctors who are arrested for putting the needs of the patient above the needs of the politician are political prisoners.
3
posted on
08/30/2006 2:25:36 PM PDT
by
mugs99
(Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
To: TruthNtegrity
4
posted on
08/30/2006 2:33:45 PM PDT
by
TruthNtegrity
(What happened to "Able Danger" and any testimony by Col Schaffer?)
To: mugs99; monday
5
posted on
08/30/2006 2:34:55 PM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(Evil is an exact science)
To: monday
Excellent point!
On the flip side, I'd like those responsible (parole boards, judges, psychiatrists who testify that someone is "no longer a threat") for releasing violent criminals back into society to be held responsible for subsequent criminal actions.
6
posted on
08/30/2006 3:09:00 PM PDT
by
generally
(Ask me about FReepers Folding@Home)
To: neverdem
I'm about as anti-drug as a person can get, but if this article is accurate, I'll side with the doctor.
I generally avoid taking either prescription drugs or OTC stuff. I usually prefer to "gut it out," but if I or someone I loved was suffering from severe chronic pain, I'd want whatever relief was possible.
Punishing a doctor who in good faith provides that relief is itself a crime.
7
posted on
08/30/2006 3:12:52 PM PDT
by
generally
(Ask me about FReepers Folding@Home)
To: neverdem
I am grateful that I do not suffer from any chronic pain.
I have such a low tolerance for "drugs" that I am unable to function in public on OTC antihistamines.
That status could change in an instant, due to disease or injury.
That said, I know two people who take large amounts of serious pain killing drugs, to enable them to merely endure the physical pain they constantly suffer.
I am also aware there are some physicians out there who "sell 'scripts" to drug abusers.
The prosecution in this case, as in seemingly endless others, overreached, and acted in a manner more suggestive of a witch hunt than of legal justice.
I'm glad they got smacked down.
8
posted on
08/30/2006 3:19:42 PM PDT
by
sarasmom
(Lead, follow, or get out of the way .The "debate" ended on 91101 for serious adults.)
To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
9
posted on
08/30/2006 6:03:52 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: freepatriot32
ping (this may be redundent story)
10
posted on
08/30/2006 8:05:39 PM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Amnesty_From_Government.htm)
To: Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; Americanwolfsbrother; Annie03; ...
as someone on this thread suggested if the man is found not guilty at his second trial the persacuters should all go to jail for kidnapping and malicious prosecution
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
11
posted on
08/31/2006 12:24:30 AM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: neverdem
The doc was accused of a 1600 pill a day rx to one patient. I couldn't eat that many M&M's in a day. The pharmacist would have had to have a direct line to a poppy field in Afghanistan or sumfin. I think it's reasonable to ask for scientific evidence that a regimen is not vastly overprescribed, as one qualification of "good faith."
To: neverdem
I think it's reasonable to ask for scientific evidence that a regimen is not vastly overprescribed, as one qualification of "good faith." ... and that the patient in fact was consuming it all himself or herself
To: neverdem
Juries should note this. The judges and prosecutors will try to force them to decide the way they want them to. Ultimately, if injustice occurs, the jury will be blamed for the injustice.
As a juror, ignore the prosecution and the judge's instruction and determine whether you can live with your decision. It never ceases to amaze me when jurors who follow instructions from the prosecutor and judges and realize they are those demonized.
Do not give into the judicial process and vote your conscience based on knowing the consequences of your decision.
To: The Red Zone
The doc was accused of a 1600 pill a day rx to one patient.
Accused is the key word here. Based on what I have seen on this case I would have a hard time believing the sun rises in the East based on this prosecutor's antics. Their abuse of the entire judicial process makes them incredibly unworthy of any sort of credibility. Bottom line, these guys do not know how not to lie. Zero credibility as affirmed by the appeals court, which was outraged by this incredible abuse.
To: microgood
this is why voir dire selects for sheeple
To: microgood
well fine, so the defense will make the prosecution look like asses on a point like this if it's part of the "objective good faith" criterion. the gummint is so afraid of any objective standard, it can't bully its way around so much when there is a law spelling out concretely what is wrong and right.
To: microgood
Accused is the key word here. Based on what I have seen on this case I would have a hard time believing the sun rises in the East based on this prosecutor's antics.
The appeals court judge didn't buy that one either!
.
18
posted on
08/31/2006 8:38:32 AM PDT
by
mugs99
(Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
To: The Red Zone
I think it's reasonable to ask for scientific evidence that a regimen is not vastly overprescribed, as one qualification of "good faith."
Medical experts testified that he did not overprescribe... This is a case of government playing doctor.
.
19
posted on
08/31/2006 8:43:22 AM PDT
by
mugs99
(Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
To: neverdem
The "War on Drugs" is doing more damage to society as a whole than the drugs do or would do in its absence.
20
posted on
08/31/2006 1:46:57 PM PDT
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson