Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Call for fertility ban for obese
BBC ^ | August 30

Posted on 08/30/2006 12:17:45 PM PDT by Bushwacker777

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last
To: Froufrou

I'm not sure. I picked this shot up here on FR. Some other folks think it's Photoshopped?


101 posted on 08/30/2006 3:01:25 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Bushwacker777

Anyone who eats Cheetos with grape soda should be banned from fertility treatments


102 posted on 08/30/2006 3:04:33 PM PDT by dennisw (Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elc

There's no short word for opposite of obese. What would it be: "unbese?"


103 posted on 08/30/2006 3:06:05 PM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bushwacker777

Obesity has become quite an industry for some. Each year they manage to change the definition for obesity so that they can included more and more people in their stats. As to the ban on fertility treatments for fat women, maybe a ban on the skinny, the stupid and the twisted would also be in order.


104 posted on 08/30/2006 3:17:21 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Lose the 'n', I think: "ubese" as in "ibese, ubese, weallbese but obese..."


105 posted on 08/30/2006 4:06:19 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Well, if you were going for gross, here's your cigar...


106 posted on 08/30/2006 4:06:49 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
Well, if you were going for gross, here's your cigar...

You have to admit. I was very clinical in my questions and comments.


107 posted on 08/30/2006 4:13:41 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Skinny.


108 posted on 08/30/2006 4:38:04 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
What was I thinking, the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor.

By your leave, I have added that to my Taglne list (and I think it will be next).

109 posted on 08/30/2006 6:58:50 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Volunteer

No problem!

So which is dumber, the Body Mass Index or the recommendation about fertility treatments based on it?


110 posted on 08/30/2006 7:08:18 PM PDT by RebelBanker (If you can't do something smart, do something right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Can you give me any valid scientific reason for the value for the height measurement to be squared rather than cubed?

The dimensions for the BMI are [mass][length]^-2.

From what I understand, this model correlates well to body fat %, at least compared to using [length]^-1 or [length]^-3. The response is more linear. However, I can see why you would be tempted to use [length]^-3 since that would be analagous to volume. Howver, human volume is not represented modeled by a cube of volume height^3.

The calculation in metric is:

[weight (kg) / height (m) / height (m)]

And in pounds/inches it is:

[weight (lb) / height (in) / height (in)] x 703

Where the 703 is the conversion factor to go from metric to pounds-inches.

To answer your question, I believe the BMI is an empirically determined model that best fits observation. However, it is a very poor model because it assumes constant muscle mass. THat's particularly bad for athletic men, who could easily be considered obese even if they have a 34" waist. For example, Bradd Pitt and Harrison Ford are considerd obese by BMI standards. The BMI is just a lazy way of stimating body fat content.

111 posted on 08/30/2006 7:25:21 PM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: zek157
Carrying a baby full term with a bmi of +30 is unhealthy for both mother and child... It's a good thing I'm not king for a day.

Good you're not king for a day either, because I've had my kids at way over that with no complications, babies and mom in perfect health.

112 posted on 01/11/2007 8:23:39 PM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson