Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GAO finds some deserters still getting paychecks
The Stars and Stripes ^ | Wednesday, August 30, 2006 | Leo Shane III

Posted on 08/30/2006 12:09:20 AM PDT by FreedomCalls

WASHINGTON — Congressional researchers have identified dozens of AWOL guardsmen and reservists receiving paychecks despite their criminal absence, and said the Army has no reliable system to ensure that those deserters are taken off the service’s payroll.

Over the last three years, the Government Accountability Office has monitored 75 cases of guardsmen and reservists who failed to report to active duty when their units were called up, but still received “improper and possibly fraudulent pay” while listed as deserters.

The researchers estimated those errors cost the Army nearly $880,000 over that span, and said their calculations “likely significantly understate the number and amount the Department of Defense paid to Army Guard and Reserve soldiers in deserter status.”

Gregory Kutz, managing director of the GAO’s special investigations, said the review of payroll records was prompted by complaints from reservists who reported the mistaken payments to their absentee colleagues.

“They were angry that folks were being paid and hadn’t shown up for duty,” he said. “This is a case of people falling through the crack in a payroll system that is not fully integrated.”

In many cases, researchers found, the problems stemmed from local unit commanders delaying or forgetting to report a servicemember AWOL to appropriate officials.

Of the 75 soldiers the GAO tracked, 51 were charged with crimes and 18 were apprehended by law enforcement officials.

The GAO researchers actually tracked down seven soldiers from the 1004th Quartermaster Company in Pennsylvania who received a combined $195,000 in improper paychecks, and handed their information over to local military officials in 2004.

But the report said as of last May, the seven servicemembers had repaid less than $18,000 of the missing cash.

Officials at the GAO recommended better enforcement of laws regarding deserters, including criminal proceedings of many of the cases they identified and better monitoring of the payroll systems.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: awol; deserters; dod; gao; military; pay
This needs to stop.
1 posted on 08/30/2006 12:09:21 AM PDT by FreedomCalls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

What happened to being "dropped from the rolls?"


2 posted on 08/30/2006 12:36:35 AM PDT by MadJack ("To the best of my recollection, senator, I don't remember.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadJack

Oops, a Seinfeld moment:

"You know how to drop 'em from the rolls, you just don't know how to drop 'em from the payrolls. And that's the most important part."


3 posted on 08/30/2006 12:44:21 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

"possibly fraudulent pay"

While AWOL

POSSIBLY ?


4 posted on 08/30/2006 2:07:33 AM PDT by Dov in Houston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dov in Houston

"possibly fraudulent" is about right.

Cutting these paychecks sounds more like just a gross error by the payroll office, someone just neglecting to enter the correct code on the computer, instead of fraud.


5 posted on 08/30/2006 2:55:39 AM PDT by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: I_Like_Spam
sounds more like just a gross error by the payroll office, someone just neglecting to enter the correct code on the computer, instead of fraud.

They kept the money didn't they? Sounds a lot like fraud to me.

6 posted on 08/30/2006 3:15:08 AM PDT by REPANDPROUDOFIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
In many cases, researchers found, the problems stemmed from local unit commanders delaying or forgetting to report a servicemember AWOL to appropriate officials.

Well, sounds like the First Sergeant and Commander aren't doing their jobs. Perhaps they're waiting for the member to show up with some alibi before charging them with the crime of AWOL, or worse crmie of desertion. That may explain the delaying. I can't defend the forgetting part.

7 posted on 08/30/2006 3:44:58 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Like_Spam

I didn't get paid for almost 4 months in the Army.

Or more accurately, they paid me, but direct deposited my money in someone else's account.

It was a wonderful experience.


8 posted on 08/30/2006 12:08:01 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: REPANDPROUDOFIT

It's direct deposit.

You can't stop someone from putting money INTO your account.

Spending it is a different issue, but a pretty good defense would be "I don't read my bank statements and just spend whatever I've got in there."

Doesn't mean they're not AWOL losers.

And doesn't mean they don't have to pay it back (they will).

But THIS PART is probably not criminal.


9 posted on 08/30/2006 12:10:58 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson