Who said anything about the primaries?
Why do Freeper of all people fall for this media led polling on who they think the nominees should be?
Some of us actually know things you don't read about in the paper, about organization, internal polls, etc. I never said a word about who I thought should be in the lead, and I never said these were who I "thought the nominees should be", but you go right ahead making assumptions if it gives you hope that Allen is somehow not in trouble. If you think the media pushing McCain and Giuliani doesn't affect their being in the lead, you go right on believing that.
I never said who I THOUGHT should be in the lead, merely looked beyond the media--MSM and conservative--to what things look like to me. You don't like it, too bad. But if you keep dreaming that organization, internal polling, fundraising, and plain old talk among party workers means nothing, you go right ahead and believe that comforting delusion.
I don't view Allen as in much trouble. And I'm pretty familiar with VA politics. So am I a dreamer?
I'm not staking a position either way, I'm just stunned at the attention fellow Freepers give to non-electoral polls.