Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-pork bill held up in secret
GopUSA ^ | August 29, 2006 | By UPI Staff

Posted on 08/29/2006 7:23:44 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran

WASHINGTON (UPI) -- The big mystery in Washington this summer is the identity of the lawmaker who put a secret hold on a sunshine bill aimed at stemming pork-barrel spending.

Efforts to smoke out the obstructer is taking place on a Web site called Porkbusters.org, which so far has cleared about a quarter of the Senate from suspicion, the Washington Times reports.

(Excerpt) Read more at gopusa.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
The measure being held up would create a searchable database allowing any interested party to see the name and amount of every federal grant, contract or award of $25,000 or more.

Holds are an unofficial part of Senate parliamentary tradition that allow a single senator to block a measure anonymously.

1 posted on 08/29/2006 7:23:45 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

This is just wrong. It's high time the entire workings of the senate (disrespect intended) come under the light of day. Those jerks need to be held accountable.


2 posted on 08/29/2006 7:27:13 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Enough with government secrecy. Other than security matters there should be no secrecy in Congress. If it is important enough for a Senator to put a hold on a bill, then he should stand proudly and publicly brag about his actions. But whichever Senator(s) did this know that his actions are best hidden from the American people like some type of cockroach.
3 posted on 08/29/2006 7:29:44 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (UN Security Council resolution 1701: I believe it is ceasefire for our time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine Sister
http://porkbusters.org/

Above URL is not bad.
4 posted on 08/29/2006 7:32:19 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

Anybody taking bets on if this Senator is a (D), (R) or (I)?


5 posted on 08/29/2006 7:34:15 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper

I'll put my vote in for Ted Stevens (R-AK) as the culprit


6 posted on 08/29/2006 7:37:29 AM PDT by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper
My guess is that a bunch of them (Senators) did it.

Now, it is like rolling thunder or one of Kerry's flip/flops.

Senator "x" was for it, then switched to opposing it.

The citizens need a "youtube" posting of their reponses!

7 posted on 08/29/2006 7:38:36 AM PDT by pointsal (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Isn't Congress always first to point the finger at the executive for not being transparent??? If this catches steam, it won't spell good for some in a couple months.


8 posted on 08/29/2006 7:40:28 AM PDT by dynamite98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Whew! When I first read the headline, I thought this was some attempt by Muzzzzzzlims to outlaw pork here in the US.

I was about to start hoarding bacon.
9 posted on 08/29/2006 7:41:16 AM PDT by LIConFem (Just opened a new seafood restaurant in Great Britain, called "Squid Pro Quid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

LOL, not my headline.


10 posted on 08/29/2006 7:43:40 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

Rush mentioned this yesterday. If they smoke this guy or gal out and they are running for reelection this cycle they are toast.


11 posted on 08/29/2006 7:51:38 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eraser2005

He was the first one I thought of as well.


12 posted on 08/29/2006 7:52:29 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper

I wonder........does the I stand of illegal? No need to answer. I know, just had to comment!!!


13 posted on 08/29/2006 7:53:01 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper
W VA Rockefeller????(sp)
14 posted on 08/29/2006 7:55:26 AM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
The measure being held up would create a searchable database allowing any interested party to see the name and amount of every federal grant, contract or award of $25,000 or more.

If that's the case, and "every" really means every, then I'd say the hold is justified. There are some contracts and awards that are better left secret.

15 posted on 08/29/2006 7:57:36 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
http://rules.senate.gov/senaterules/standingrules.txt

Above URL is the "complete" Senate rules.

I am trying to find the rule.
16 posted on 08/29/2006 7:57:57 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

"Sheets" Byrd... IMHO


17 posted on 08/29/2006 7:58:57 AM PDT by Wings-n-Wind (All of the answers remain available; Wisdom is gained by asking the right questions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eraser2005

LOL

Senator Stevens was the first one to come to mind here, too. After his wailing and crying in the Senate Well last year over his bridges to nowhere, he would be my first suspect.


18 posted on 08/29/2006 7:59:47 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: pointsal
from Today's Toons 8/29/06


20 posted on 08/29/2006 8:01:41 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson