To: dayglored
Its all BS, and designed to do one thing and one thing only. Keeping smokers from smoking because the nanny state doesn't like it. Thats all any of these laws are about.
If it were about health tobacco would have been banned years ago. Its not about anyones health anymore.. its a move toward prohibition and control.
11 posted on
08/28/2006 8:14:32 PM PDT by
eXe
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: eXe
>
Keeping smokers from smoking because the nanny state doesn't like it. Thats all any of these laws are about.... It's not about anyones health anymore.. its a move toward prohibition and control. I'm afraid you're absolutely correct.
And what are we going to do about it?
13 posted on
08/28/2006 8:18:18 PM PDT by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: eXe
It has nothing to do with health, but about the government's ability to control every aspect of your private life.
I have drawn my line in the sand.
YOU CAN NOT CROSS THIS!
14 posted on
08/28/2006 8:19:19 PM PDT by
Hunble
(Why?)
To: eXe
The conundrum for gov't is they want the tax revenue so they can't prohibit and have a real problem claiming the moral high ground. Prohibit, show some principle, at your peril.
To: eXe
If it were about health tobacco would have been banned years ago. Its not about anyones health anymore.. its a move toward prohibition and control. And taxes, and fines, and class action lawsuits...
100 posted on
08/29/2006 6:50:34 AM PDT by
weegee
(Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson