This is interesting because an argument could be made that the umbilical cord contents belong to the mother? So it bypasses any messy ethical questions. I for one have no problem with it.
To: ichabodcrane; 4lifeandliberty; AbsoluteGrace; afraidfortherepublic; Alamo-Girl; anniegetyourgun; ...
Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping!
Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping list...*
* - I am moving so will be away from FR and computers in general from September 1st to September 10th. Please bear with me as I attempt to resume my 'duties'! :) Thanks!
2 posted on
08/28/2006 5:09:55 PM PDT by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: ichabodcrane
There are a couple companies in the U.S. that do this. My guess is that within 10 years the government will be asking all parents to donate umbilical blood for a national stem cell bank.
Of course the liberals will be disappointed because they won't have the chance to kill an embryo.
3 posted on
08/28/2006 5:10:15 PM PDT by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: ichabodcrane
Yes, calling the umbilical cord a baby is beyond even the TVC.
4 posted on
08/28/2006 5:10:31 PM PDT by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com)
To: ichabodcrane
To: ichabodcrane
If the baby 'belongs to the mother' then so does the placenta. But in point of fact, the mother did not make the placenta or the baby, the baby began that construction process from the very beginning following conception.
6 posted on
08/28/2006 6:48:40 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: ichabodcrane; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
9 posted on
08/28/2006 6:55:08 PM PDT by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
To: ichabodcrane
There's at least 5 companies doing this in the US that I can think of.
The difference is, in the US a lot of people who aren't professional athletes are rich enough to do it.
10 posted on
08/28/2006 6:56:43 PM PDT by
gaijin
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson