[Milhous]

It's always fun to contrast Time's cover treatment of its pet Hitlery:

with Time's cover treatment of people it hates:

[justiceseeker93]

It's always fun to contrast Time's cover treatment of its pet Hillary...with Time's cover treatment of people that it hates.

You hit the nail right on the head regarding their double standard.

Could you possibly date and enlarge the ten(!) HRC covers so that we can get a chance to see some faux age "regression" with time?

Not only the cover shots are Photoshopped, but some inside pics as well, both in the current issue and previous ones. A good example is the closeup of her in this year's "100 Most Influential" issue (May 8). I'm almost certain that none of the other 99 received the same treatment from their photographers.

Not only are the "people they hate" not touched up to look better as HRC is, but their photos are doctored to make them look worse - the Ann Coulter cover shot is a good example.

As I said, it may be funny to some people but it nonetheless is another MSM scandal in and of itself.