Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Milhous
It's always fun to contrast Time's cover treatment of its pet Hillary...with Time's cover treatment of people that it hates.

You hit the nail right on the head regarding their double standard.

Could you possibly date and enlarge the ten(!) HRC covers so that we can get a chance to see some faux age "regression" with time?

Not only the cover shots are Photoshopped, but some inside pics as well, both in the current issue and previous ones. A good example is the closeup of her in this year's "100 Most Influential" issue (May 8). I'm almost certain that none of the other 99 received the same treatment from their photographers.

Not only are the "people they hate" not touched up to look better as HRC is, but their photos are doctored to make them look worse - the Ann Coulter cover shot is a good example.

As I said, it may be funny to some people but it nonetheless is another MSM scandal in and of itself.

66 posted on 08/28/2006 10:40:06 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: justiceseeker93
Aug. 28, 2006
Jun. 16, 2003
Mar. 1, 1999
Feb. 22, 1999
Aug. 31, 1998
Oct. 20, 1997
Jul. 1, 1996
Mar. 18, 1996
Mar. 21, 1994
May. 10, 1993
Sep. 14, 1992

74 posted on 08/29/2006 8:34:26 PM PDT by Milhous (Twixt truth and madness lies but a sliver of a stream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson