Excellent article, suggest bookmarking it to be used to refute liberal rants/lies on the subject.
To: FairOpinion
Everyone knows it's true, of course. The moronic filth of the liberal party, however, insist the Constitution really doesn't invest military power in the hands of the Executive.
No. They shopped for a fellow fanatic and wrote up their little papers to "prove" otherwise.
2 posted on
08/27/2006 5:44:18 PM PDT by
Reactionary
(The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
To: FairOpinion
In a nutshell, Judge Taylor claimed that under our Constitution, Hitchens right to never have his overseas telephone calls intercepted without a warrant trumps the right of Americans not to be blown to smithereens. In one sentence, the author has summarized the entire argument. The End.
4 posted on
08/27/2006 5:59:00 PM PDT by
Uncle Vlad
(You cannot protect the peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.)
To: FairOpinion
So, are Hitchen's true colors showing? He's a big lib but has said the right things about being tough on the enemy. But where the rubber meets the road it seems that he's on their side.
5 posted on
08/27/2006 6:13:47 PM PDT by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: FairOpinion
6 posted on
08/27/2006 6:17:02 PM PDT by
Skooz
(Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
To: FairOpinion
I hope that this biased and incompetent "decision" by this pathetic excuse for a federal "judge" does become an election issue. The more citizens who know more about this case, the more will vote for Republicans and against Democrats on the subject of national security and the war against the MAZIS (Muslims who act like Nazis).
See below for more on this case.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article: "Bad Judges Make Bad Law."
Please see my most recent statement on running for Congress, here.
To: FairOpinion
Ah, but George W. Bush was never President before! Curbing Bush takes precedence over precedent. One might call it a super-precedent. Unless Senator Specter has already detected some other super-precedent, in which case curbing Bush would be above that also, an uber-super-precedent.
All these impeachable offenses will be proper again---as soon as a Democrat disgraces the White House again.
11 posted on
08/27/2006 6:47:27 PM PDT by
Graymatter
(Bacon akbar!)
To: FairOpinion
I just finished reading "American Prometheus," a biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer. During WWII, illegal wiretapping and surveillance of the top people working on the atomic bomb was commonplace. Many had outright communist sympathies and were constantly watched and bugged. I seem to recall we had a Dem president in that era, too.
To: FairOpinion
Why is this issue not already in a true court? Why is this carter whore not yet in chains in jail?
13 posted on
08/27/2006 7:06:11 PM PDT by
TimesDomain
(When a judge declares himself "MASTER", you become his "SLAVE")
To: FairOpinion
19 posted on
08/28/2006 11:34:34 AM PDT by
4woodenboats
(The GOP was created by those opposed to Southern Democrat Plantation Slavery...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson