Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

4 more years of 10% a year state budget increases, 4 more years of long-term debt acquisition, 4 more years of GReening California ..

Oh, did I mention more debt?

Why am I not excited about the choices on the ballot this November?

1 posted on 08/27/2006 10:18:32 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NormsRevenge
Get ready for FO's latest "Angelides" cut and paste and a landslide of excess <p> characters
2 posted on 08/27/2006 10:23:00 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a starving man needs a tapeworm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
But Angelides adviser Bill Carrick said the treasurer's policies should appeal to the vast majority of middle-class Californians, including a rollback of college fees and expanded education and health care.

For those who think there's no difference between Arnold and Angelides, here it is: Arnold knows we know that such "benefits to the middle-class" are paid for by higher taxes on the middle class; Angelides thinks we're too damn stupid to realize it. Angelides will give us higher taxes, higher workers compensation premiums (rollback of the workers compensation reform act), gay marriage, and drivers licenses for illegals. With Arnold, we can grumble about his dem adviser, his eco-friendly nonsense, and lots of other RINO acts, but he is still against raising taxes and undoing workers comp reform, both of which are essential to the continued economic health of California. End of political rant.

3 posted on 08/27/2006 10:31:09 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Arnold is a Liberal, a Liberal that isn't as extreme as Pelosi.

That makes him attractive to the Democrats and Independents that are Liberals, but not Kos/Lamont Liberals. Ditto for the Liberal Republicans in the state, of which there are many.

He's a celebrity.

Sure, I could lament the fact he's a liberal as a lot of conservatives justifiably do...but I'm grounded enough to know the draw his "celebrity" has on the voters of Cali. Including Republicans. There's no point in trying to fight it here.

It's always been his to lose.

If he wasn't a celebrity, it would be a different story. But the Terminator is likely to be sent back to office. Afterwards, who knows, he may run for Senate. He can't run for President and politicians rarely like to retire so young in their lives.


4 posted on 08/27/2006 10:33:01 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
I don't see any reason to bother. I won't vote for a liberal just because he happens to wear the "R" label - Its the principle, stupid. If I wanted to vote for a liberal, I's still be a Democrat!

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

5 posted on 08/27/2006 10:35:08 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson