Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Gingrich's to Lose (Zogby '08 White House Poll Shows Tancredo 4th)
US News and World Report ^ | August 28, 2006 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 08/27/2006 9:01:53 AM PDT by gopwinsin04

Washington Whispers

It's Gingrich's to Lose in 2008

Sorry, Hillary. And Big John, you might have missed your chance in 2000.

That's because a new and innovative poll from John Zogby about 2008 presidential candidates finds former Republican Speaker Newt Gingrich way out front of fellow GOP-ers like Sen. John McCain and also finds moderates like former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner far ahead of libs like Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Here's the unusual thing about the Zogby poll released to Whispers: When questioning likely primary voters, only brief biographies and not names were given.

In other words, voters picked the one with the best experience. Without her name recognition working for her, Clinton came in a miserable sixth out of 10.

"It looks like the Democrats want to grab the middle," says Zogby, who says outside-the-beltway Democrats lean moderate.

Surprises on the GOP side: Harsh immigration critic Rep. Tom Tancredo ranks fourth, showing the power of the anti-immigrant issue.

Is the poll important? Big time. In 1999, Zogby's "blind bios" poll identified "maverick" McCain as a very attractive candidate in primary states long before he almost knocked off George W. Bush.

The Democratic order and percentage: Warner, 14.8; retired Gen. Wesley Clark, 14.2; Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold, 12.2; Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh, 11.1; former Sen. John Edwards, 10.4; Clinton, 5.6; New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, 5.3; former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel, 4.9; Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, 4.9; Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, 3; Delaware Sen. Joe Biden, 2.8.

The GOP rankings: Gingrich, 21.4; McCain, 13.3; former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, 11.2; Tancredo, 9.9; Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel, 6.1; Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, 5.8; Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, 5.6; Virginia Sen. George Allen, 4.9; Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback,4.3; Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, 3.8; New York Gov. George Pataki, 2.8.

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008polls; allen2008; gingrich2008; hillary2008; mccain2008; newtforfoxnewspundit; warner2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-245 next last
To: ark_girl

You would vote for Hillary over McCain, if you only had those two choices?


121 posted on 08/27/2006 9:54:43 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio; gopwinsin04; All

I wish I had good Photoshop skills...anyone?


122 posted on 08/27/2006 9:54:43 AM PDT by JRios1968 (This kid knows how to wallop a baseball!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: metesky
He isn't a control freak! He is a Christian who happens to believe that his body is the Temple of God.
123 posted on 08/27/2006 9:55:33 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Yep. Our roads are better. Our colleges are better. Our schools still need some work, but at least Mike's honest about that. Our park systems are better. Our economy is better.

Bill basically did the same thing as gov that he did as President. He ran his mouth a lot...was really charming...but, I'm not really sure what he actually DID to improve anything.


124 posted on 08/27/2006 9:55:55 AM PDT by ark_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
The entire premise of this "poll", and its conclusions, is laughable.

Zogby cannot be taken seriously.

125 posted on 08/27/2006 9:55:59 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ark_girl
Didn't Arkansas change from the Land of Opportunity to the Natural State or something like that under Clinton??
126 posted on 08/27/2006 9:58:18 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

I sure would.


127 posted on 08/27/2006 9:58:31 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: All

Zogby is doing us a great service when he puts out ANY poll because he gives hope to the ignorant libs by them. Zogby thinks he outsmarts us, yet he hurts his donk cause. Typical liberal thinking they are smarter than us, yet the ydo not realize the damage they cause.


128 posted on 08/27/2006 9:58:58 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

No, I just wouldn't vote on the Presidential election. I honestly have equal disdain for both of them.


129 posted on 08/27/2006 9:59:42 AM PDT by ark_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
So true, the McCainiac is anti-gun, anti-free speech, anti-tax relief. Why exactly is this guy a Republican anyway?

Yeah you got to wonder. Especially now that he is playing footsie with the Soros funded "Republicans for Choice" pro Abortion group. Just what is he a Conservative ON anymore. He says the right stuff on spending but DOES nothing

130 posted on 08/27/2006 9:59:55 AM PDT by MNJohnnie ( Elections are more important then the feelings of the POS Cons (Perpetually Offended Syndrome))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Let's not let them in on the secret!


131 posted on 08/27/2006 10:00:26 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Gingrich's record of shameful personal behavior is not going to win over the family values crowd.

Gingrich and Giuliani have wildly different positions on a host of issues, but both are unelectable for the same reason:

America will not elect a home wrecker for First Lady.

132 posted on 08/27/2006 10:02:23 AM PDT by Invisible Gorilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

"Arkansas has prospered under him.."

No more Southern governors as Presidents! Hasn't recent history taught us that?


133 posted on 08/27/2006 10:03:17 AM PDT by jwh_Denver (I can't beat em but I ain't joining them either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Invisible Gorilla

They elected JFK & Lyndon Johnson.


134 posted on 08/27/2006 10:03:33 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Zogby: the first to call '04 for Kerry. The guy is a shameless jihad-democrat along with his smarmy brother who runs CAIR. I think he called one major election correctly, and on this is based what he likes to think of as a reputation. Scum.


135 posted on 08/27/2006 10:03:38 AM PDT by rmgatto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
Than you do not understand the evil of Hillary and your understanding of the "big picture" regarding condervative values is blurred.

Hillary would appoint more Gingsburgs to the supremes, appoint activist federal judges all around the country, target her political enemies with dirty prosecutors, use the IRS to audit people she disagreed with and much more more.

If you believe in conservative causes, the damage Hillary could do in four years, would effect us for many. Look at this idiotic judge that said the NSA program was illegal. This was a CARTER appointee. How long has that idiot been out of office?
136 posted on 08/27/2006 10:04:45 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: ark_girl

McCain always seems to me as if his head is going to explode, any second. Which brings to mind the old LBJ "nuke" campaign ad against Goldwater. Do I want this conflicted, "complicated" hothead in charge? No.


137 posted on 08/27/2006 10:05:23 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ark_girl

A non-vote would be a vote for Hillary.


138 posted on 08/27/2006 10:05:37 AM PDT by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

"I like Newt but he is unelectable."

Just like Clinton was unelectable for his second term?


139 posted on 08/27/2006 10:06:09 AM PDT by babygene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rmgatto

PS-I agree that Newt is WAY over the baggage weight limit to win the nomination much less the general election. Which may be why Zogby rigged the poll this way.


140 posted on 08/27/2006 10:06:27 AM PDT by rmgatto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson