1 posted on
08/26/2006 8:36:23 AM PDT by
lowbridge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: lowbridge
Should Mr. Shaw's wildest dreams come and there is an attack, wouldn't that propel Rudy Giuliani to the forefront?
33 posted on
08/26/2006 10:04:25 AM PDT by
mingwah
To: lowbridge
Obsessed, are we? (The HuffPo lunatic, I mean).
41 posted on
08/26/2006 10:47:16 AM PDT by
kesg
To: lowbridge
To be fair most of the comments to this on Huffpo are negative. Of course many who agree may not want to post comments. Consider how many liberals want us to lose the Iraq war.
43 posted on
08/26/2006 10:58:59 AM PDT by
willk
To: lowbridge
The unintended consequences of arianna's website has given us a window in the evil souls who wish us harm as a way to regain powers.
45 posted on
08/26/2006 11:16:57 AM PDT by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: lowbridge
Just like their heroes Mao and Stalin, if the ends justify the means. Who would be surprised if they staged an attack to win an election?
Pray for W and Our Troops
47 posted on
08/26/2006 11:34:23 AM PDT by
bray
(Koffi 4 Food has Failed.......Again)
To: lowbridge
Two words come to mind when I read his words; warped and evil. That man is pure 100% evil.
To: lowbridge
do I
really have to say it???
60 posted on
08/27/2006 8:18:03 AM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: lowbridge
Does this analogy work? Huffington Post want not to kill all Americans....just some Americans so the democrats can gain power.
Bin Laden wants to kill 10,000,000 Americans, not all Americans to gain power.
Sounds like it is sympatico with each other. Someone tell me the difference. Same logic. Same stategy, just a matter of degree?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson