To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...
MSNBC/NewsBusters Abrams-attacks-NYTimes ping to Today show list.
2 posted on
08/25/2006 3:53:40 PM PDT by
governsleastgovernsbest
(Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Wow, I am a little surprised at this outburst. Interesting.
3 posted on
08/25/2006 3:58:53 PM PDT by
Uncle Hal
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The Times is staffed with reporters and editors with personal agendas...it is like a day care center staffed with pedophiles...
To: abb; Perdogg
Ping List please. Folks posting here do not seem aware that Abrams came out slugging on the Duke case, from the get-go, in public, when all the droidbot Femmes were shrieking "OFF WITH THE HEADS OF THE DUKE BOYS/WOMEN NEVER LIE!". And before ANY facts were available. Lesson? Femme droidbots prefer "spin" rather than facts or truth.
Whoa, but feminism is shooting itself. Big time. Live by abortion, die by ratings abortion.
I'd like to say to them "Have a Life"; but it seems they prefer otherwise, they'd rather take one.
10 posted on
08/25/2006 5:14:18 PM PDT by
Alia
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"For the New York Times to come forward on the front page and claim it's an objective assessment of the 1,850 pages [of evidence] -- either they didn't read them or they got smookered." Is that a typo, or did Dan really say "smookered"?
11 posted on
08/25/2006 7:46:40 PM PDT by
demkicker
(democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"this is one of those days I'm sorry I still don't have a show." So am I as he was staunch defender of the players and never let the spin from legal pundits get in the way of the facts. Only consolation is that without Abrams we won't have to endure the mean spirited tirades of Janie Weintraub and Jeralyn (sp?) Merrit who never comes up for air.
12 posted on
08/25/2006 7:50:08 PM PDT by
StarFan
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I like Dan Abrahms a lot. I have no idea why anybody reads the NY Times anymore. You notice, he no longer refers to it as "the paper of records" or "America's premier newspaper"? And neither does anyone else (who is credible.)
13 posted on
08/26/2006 1:25:37 AM PDT by
N. Beaujon
(http://www.nbeaujon.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson