To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
As we here all know, this scheme is so obviously unworkable and actually crosses the line into the absurd.
However, when viewed in the light of what it's true purpose is, i.e.: the slow strangulation of firearms ownership by the law-abiding, it all makes perfect sense.
51 posted on
08/25/2006 5:54:33 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: Joe Brower
...when viewed in the light of what it's true purpose is, i.e.: the slow strangulation of firearms ownership by the law-abiding, it all makes perfect sense.Joe, I have been in the RKBA wars since the mid-sixties, and one thing that drives me bats about the anti-2nd Amendement moonbats ( and most of the more virulent Left today ) is the way they never quit agitating.
It doesn't matter how asinine, absurd, unworkable or unconstitutional the "scheme de jure" is- as long as it gives them something to promote, to chatter endlessly about, to chat up at cocktail parties or on TV- they're 100% for it.
53 posted on
08/25/2006 6:03:01 AM PDT by
backhoe
(What part of "Shall NOT be Infringed" is so hard to understand?)
To: Joe Brower
However, when viewed in the light of what it's true purpose is, i.e.: the slow strangulation of firearms ownership by the law-abiding, it all makes perfect sense. You know, they pretty much banned semi-autos out there and now they want ballistic imaging? What good is ballistic imaging (rhetorical) it the majority of the guns don't eject the casings?
54 posted on
08/25/2006 6:09:58 AM PDT by
kerryusama04
(Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
To: Joe Brower
However, when viewed in the light of what it's true purpose is, i.e.: the slow strangulation of firearms ownership by the law-abiding, it all makes perfect sense.It sure does.
60 posted on
08/25/2006 6:59:30 AM PDT by
Ladysmith
((NRA, SAS) Gun owners have illustrated rights are individual and can be protected by individuals.)
To: Joe Brower
"As we here all know, this scheme is so obviously unworkable and actually crosses the line into the absurd." The more absurd it is, the better the moonbats in California like it.
62 posted on
08/25/2006 7:01:51 AM PDT by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: Joe Brower
However, when viewed in the light of what it's true purpose is, i.e.: the slow strangulation of firearms ownership by the law-abiding, it all makes perfect sense.
Your correct, death by a thousand cuts. Eventually the only ones with guns will be bad guys and then guns will be really bad.
65 posted on
08/25/2006 7:10:01 AM PDT by
mr_hammer
(They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
To: Joe Brower
Key phrase
With the support of forty-one police chiefs from around the state
Once again for those who haven't been listening, the police are not on the side of individual rights. They're just like any other government bureaucrats when taken en mass. They want helpless sheep to fleece.
72 posted on
08/25/2006 8:09:39 AM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
To: Joe Brower
Thanks so much for pinging me on the gun issues.
Thought you might appreciate these links.
www.theshootingwire.com
www.theoutdoorwire.com
www.theoutdoorpressroom.com
87 posted on
08/25/2006 1:49:17 PM PDT by
girlangler
((Fish fear me))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson