Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
As we here all know, this scheme is so obviously unworkable and actually crosses the line into the absurd.

However, when viewed in the light of what it's true purpose is, i.e.: the slow strangulation of firearms ownership by the law-abiding, it all makes perfect sense.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

51 posted on 08/25/2006 5:54:33 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Brower
...when viewed in the light of what it's true purpose is, i.e.: the slow strangulation of firearms ownership by the law-abiding, it all makes perfect sense.

Joe, I have been in the RKBA wars since the mid-sixties, and one thing that drives me bats about the anti-2nd Amendement moonbats ( and most of the more virulent Left today ) is the way they never quit agitating.

It doesn't matter how asinine, absurd, unworkable or unconstitutional the "scheme de jure" is- as long as it gives them something to promote, to chatter endlessly about, to chat up at cocktail parties or on TV- they're 100% for it.

53 posted on 08/25/2006 6:03:01 AM PDT by backhoe (What part of "Shall NOT be Infringed" is so hard to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower
However, when viewed in the light of what it's true purpose is, i.e.: the slow strangulation of firearms ownership by the law-abiding, it all makes perfect sense.

You know, they pretty much banned semi-autos out there and now they want ballistic imaging? What good is ballistic imaging (rhetorical) it the majority of the guns don't eject the casings?

54 posted on 08/25/2006 6:09:58 AM PDT by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower
However, when viewed in the light of what it's true purpose is, i.e.: the slow strangulation of firearms ownership by the law-abiding, it all makes perfect sense.

It sure does.

60 posted on 08/25/2006 6:59:30 AM PDT by Ladysmith ((NRA, SAS) Gun owners have illustrated rights are individual and can be protected by individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower
"As we here all know, this scheme is so obviously unworkable and actually crosses the line into the absurd."

The more absurd it is, the better the moonbats in California like it.

62 posted on 08/25/2006 7:01:51 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower

However, when viewed in the light of what it's true purpose is, i.e.: the slow strangulation of firearms ownership by the law-abiding, it all makes perfect sense.

Your correct, death by a thousand cuts. Eventually the only ones with guns will be bad guys and then guns will be really bad.


65 posted on 08/25/2006 7:10:01 AM PDT by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower
Key phrase

With the support of forty-one police chiefs from around the state

Once again for those who haven't been listening, the police are not on the side of individual rights. They're just like any other government bureaucrats when taken en mass. They want helpless sheep to fleece.

72 posted on 08/25/2006 8:09:39 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower

Thanks so much for pinging me on the gun issues.

Thought you might appreciate these links.

www.theshootingwire.com

www.theoutdoorwire.com

www.theoutdoorpressroom.com


87 posted on 08/25/2006 1:49:17 PM PDT by girlangler ((Fish fear me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson