Posted on 08/24/2006 2:47:17 PM PDT by Fudd Fan
Welcome to “The Levin Lounge”… Step in and have a FRink.
Will we hear… 
Welcome all, to the most FUN LIVE THREAD on FreeRepublic!
Who'd he serve with, where was he?
WOW that brings back memories of Snow Days!
US military recruitment on target: Pentagon (Someone Tell This to the LIAR Murtha)
The AFP via Yahoo! News ^ | August 10, 2006
Posted on 08/24/2006 6:37:28 PM EDT by new yorker 77
Military recruiters either met or exceeded their goals in July, putting the US active duty force in a strong position to finish the year with the needed number of new recruits, Pentagon figures show.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1689528/posts
Excellent point!
Appeasement never stops onslaught
WALTER E. WILLIAMS
http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/mld/sunnews/news/opinion/15347241.htm
Brit's show has taken on Joe Biden and Pat Buchanan today...whoo-hooooo!!!
Gotta love Brit!
:-)
Just got here -- the LTC is doing fine, just in a lot of pain -- kicked me out of his room --
Korea?
TERRORISM
Appeasement never stops onslaught
WALTER E. WILLIAMS
Does the United States have the power to eliminate terrorists and the states that support them? In terms of capacity, as opposed to will, the answer is a clear yes.
Think about it. Currently, the U.S. has an arsenal of 18 Ohio class submarines. Just one submarine is loaded with 24 Trident nuclear missiles. Each missile has eight nuclear warheads capable of being independently targeted. That means the U.S. alone has the capacity to wipe out Iran, Syria or any other state that supports terrorist groups or engages in terrorism - without risking the life of a single soldier.
Terrorist supporters know we have this capacity, but because of worldwide public opinion, which often appears to be on their side, coupled with our weak will, we'll never use it. Today's Americans are vastly different from those of my generation who fought the life-and-death struggle of World War II. Any attempt to annihilate our Middle East enemies would create all sorts of handwringing about the innocent lives lost.
Such an argument would have fallen on deaf ears during World War II when we firebombed cities in Germany and Japan. The loss of lives in saturation bombing far exceeded those lost through the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
After the battle of Midway, and the long string of Japanese defeats in the Pacific, including Guam, Okinawa and the Philippines, had today's Americans been around, they'd be willing to negotiate with Japan for peace, pointing to the additional loss of lives if we continued the war. More than likely they would have made the same argument in 1945, when German defeat was imminent. Of course, had there been a peace agreement with Japan and Germany, all it would have achieved would have been to give them time to recoup their losses and resume their aggression later, possibly equipped with nuclear weapons.
We might also note that the occupation of Germany and Japan didn't pose the occupation problems we face in Iraq. The reason is we completely demoralized our enemies, leaving them with neither the will nor the means to resist.
Our adversaries in the Middle East have advantages the axis powers didn't have - the Western press and public opinion. We've seen widespread condemnation of alleged atrocities and prisoner mistreatment by the U.S., but how much media condemnation have you seen of beheadings and other gross atrocities by Islamists?
Terrorists must be pleased by statements of some members of Congress, such as those by Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., who recently said, "I don't take sides for or against Hezbollah." Hezbollah, backed by Iran, is responsible for the 1983 bombing of Beirut barracks killing 241 U.S. service members.
I'm not suggesting we rush to use our nuclear capacity to crush states that support terrorism. I'm sure there are other less drastic military options. What I am suggesting is that I know of no instances where appeasement, such as the current Western modus operandi, has borne fruit.
What Europeans say about what should be done about terrorist states should fall on deaf ears. Their history of weakness and cowardice during the 1930s goes a long way toward accounting for the 60 million lives lost during World War II. During the mid-'30s, when Hitler started violating the arms limitations of the Versailles Treaty, France and Britain alone could have defeated him, but they pursued the appeasement route.
Anyone who thinks current Western appeasement efforts will get Iran to end its nuclear weapons program and end its desire to eliminate Israel is dumber than dumb. Appeasement will strengthen Iran's hand, and it looks as if the West, including the U.S., is willing to be complicit in that strengthening.
212 posts at 41 minutes = 620 for 120 minutes.
Great NEWS!
Thank heavens, he's doing ok! Thanks for updating us. Will still keep him in my prayers.
Give him our Best Wishes for a full recovery!
What's he saying about Uncle Pat?
Give him a "tickle" from us. :0)
Three cheers for THE PROFESSOR OF LIBERTY!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.