1 posted on
08/24/2006 2:21:30 PM PDT by
KstoDC
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: KstoDC
I'm just making an assumption here but I'm guessing that neither Yello or Red are legal gun owners.
2 posted on
08/24/2006 2:24:48 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: KstoDC
A bit disturbing in it's ramifications.
3 posted on
08/24/2006 2:25:02 PM PDT by
kinoxi
To: KstoDC
There's a whole mess of people who need killin'
4 posted on
08/24/2006 2:25:28 PM PDT by
msnimje
(What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
To: KstoDC
Fred Grimm and his editor ought to be horse whipped for this article making it to publication.
It is and always will be illegal for a felon to own or possess a firearm in the great state of Florida.
5 posted on
08/24/2006 2:26:30 PM PDT by
Fighting Irish
(Béagán agus a rá go maith)
To: KstoDC
Talk about reaching for a straw man.
6 posted on
08/24/2006 2:27:13 PM PDT by
Egon
(We are number one! All others are number two... or lower.)
To: KstoDC
I'm sure if a Miami resident is threatened by thugs, the Miami Herald will send someone over to defend them with pious platitudes and warm feelings.
7 posted on
08/24/2006 2:29:03 PM PDT by
keithtoo
(Israeli defense strategy "Cogito Ergo Boom!")
To: KstoDC
...both with long rap sheets So how did they legally own guns? I am guessing they didn't. If so, the debate stops right there for me
8 posted on
08/24/2006 2:29:15 PM PDT by
Gator101
To: KstoDC
Police say a stray bullet The issue is not as presented. Whoever fired the fatal bullet is responsible and the intent of causing injury was present. No accident.
9 posted on
08/24/2006 2:30:32 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: KstoDC
In June, unarmed Jason Rosenbloom was shot during an argument in Clearwater with his next-door neighbor. He was shot just outside the neighbor's front door. The neighbor said he was afraid.The devil, as always, is in the details. Was this a friendly disagreement, like whether the Dolphins were going to suck this year, or a violent outburst, like "come out here so I can kick your ass"? Considering the outcome, I would suspect the latter, in which case it's a justified shooting (and a good law).
11 posted on
08/24/2006 2:31:22 PM PDT by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: KstoDC
Subtle defense.
Of course, self-defense doesn't usually involve arbitrarily killing other people, but this is made to order for the anti-gun crowd.
Of course, the criminal lawyers who are abusing the law this way are themselves to blame for the mis-use.
12 posted on
08/24/2006 2:32:28 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: KstoDC
"Unfortunately, you can't write a law that says only good citizens can use deadly force to protect themselves,'' Ahhh, but you can write a law that says only good citizens can legally own guns. I believe we already have quite a few.
These punks gave up the right to use guns, even in defense, when they turned to a life of crime.
14 posted on
08/24/2006 2:33:49 PM PDT by
Gator101
To: KstoDC
The MSM in Fla has gone berserk since the passing of this law, making it sound like the streets are awash in blood.
They aren't; violent crime is actually down.
The so called "Stand Your Ground" law hasn't affected the laws regarding 'concealed carry' one bit.
15 posted on
08/24/2006 2:33:51 PM PDT by
E8Ret
To: KstoDC
18 posted on
08/24/2006 2:35:15 PM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
To: KstoDC
What's your opinion on this?
As you are a brand new user, I'm curious about your choice for a first post.
19 posted on
08/24/2006 2:35:24 PM PDT by
TChris
(Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
To: KstoDC

Not the same guy. Just thought the nick of one of the thugs rang a bell.
To: KstoDC
The is a reason the Miami (leftist) Herald is nervious.
Since theives will know everyone ELSE is armed, Herald reporters will be easy pickings.
Does anyone know if the Herald building uses armed guards?
Do people pass through security?
Is there a security desk?
The Herald is spining a lie, this law has ALWAYS been thus in FL.
this law is really about TORT REFORM. Real, live, and lawyer crippling tort reform.
21 posted on
08/24/2006 2:36:45 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: KstoDC
What a shock.
Liberal anti gun cooks predicting blood in the streets...again! Now otherwise law abiding folks will go on a killing rampages, just because they're now allowed to, GASP, DEFEND THEMSELVES!!!
Just because they've been wrong every time before, is no reason we shouldn't listen to them now. Don't you people see how much smarter they are, and how much they care?
23 posted on
08/24/2006 2:39:29 PM PDT by
Jotmo
(I Had a Bad Experience With the CIA and Now I'm Gonna Show You My Feminine Side - Swirling Eddies)
To: KstoDC
So the law was put into place to help the victim of a crime to defend his property.
The two people stood there own ground. And someone killed a little girl. The person who shot the bullet is responsible for the girls death.
Why does it complicate the case? The two were thugs, one killed a person with his actions, doesn't matter if he was shooting at the other in self defense.
My guess is the prosecutor wants to try both of them for the death and can only legally prosecute one of them.
To: KstoDC
Greasy criminal lawyer uses self-defense law to defend criminals, so leftie editor blames law-abiding gun owners. typical all around.
To: KstoDC
...Damon ''Red Rock'' Darling and Leroy ''Yellow Man'' LaRose... I guess "Double D" and "Rosie" would not have had the desired street cred effect.
35 posted on
08/24/2006 2:57:15 PM PDT by
Sender
(“Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today.”)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson