Skip to comments.
New law gives too many people a license to kill
Miami Herald ^
| August 24, 2006
| Fred Grimm
Posted on 08/24/2006 2:21:29 PM PDT by KstoDC
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
08/24/2006 2:21:30 PM PDT
by
KstoDC
To: KstoDC
I'm just making an assumption here but I'm guessing that neither Yello or Red are legal gun owners.
2
posted on
08/24/2006 2:24:48 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: KstoDC
A bit disturbing in it's ramifications.
3
posted on
08/24/2006 2:25:02 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: KstoDC
There's a whole mess of people who need killin'
4
posted on
08/24/2006 2:25:28 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
To: KstoDC
Fred Grimm and his editor ought to be horse whipped for this article making it to publication.
It is and always will be illegal for a felon to own or possess a firearm in the great state of Florida.
5
posted on
08/24/2006 2:26:30 PM PDT
by
Fighting Irish
(Béagán agus a rá go maith)
To: KstoDC
Talk about reaching for a straw man.
6
posted on
08/24/2006 2:27:13 PM PDT
by
Egon
(We are number one! All others are number two... or lower.)
To: KstoDC
I'm sure if a Miami resident is threatened by thugs, the Miami Herald will send someone over to defend them with pious platitudes and warm feelings.
7
posted on
08/24/2006 2:29:03 PM PDT
by
keithtoo
(Israeli defense strategy "Cogito Ergo Boom!")
To: KstoDC
...both with long rap sheets So how did they legally own guns? I am guessing they didn't. If so, the debate stops right there for me
8
posted on
08/24/2006 2:29:15 PM PDT
by
Gator101
To: KstoDC
Police say a stray bullet The issue is not as presented. Whoever fired the fatal bullet is responsible and the intent of causing injury was present. No accident.
9
posted on
08/24/2006 2:30:32 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Egon
"Talk about reaching for a straw man."
Yep! Lets not talk about why these third world savages (with admittedly long rap sheets) were running loose in the first place instead of picking up trash along a Florida highway.
10
posted on
08/24/2006 2:30:32 PM PDT
by
samm1148
To: KstoDC
In June, unarmed Jason Rosenbloom was shot during an argument in Clearwater with his next-door neighbor. He was shot just outside the neighbor's front door. The neighbor said he was afraid.The devil, as always, is in the details. Was this a friendly disagreement, like whether the Dolphins were going to suck this year, or a violent outburst, like "come out here so I can kick your ass"? Considering the outcome, I would suspect the latter, in which case it's a justified shooting (and a good law).
11
posted on
08/24/2006 2:31:22 PM PDT
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: KstoDC
Subtle defense.
Of course, self-defense doesn't usually involve arbitrarily killing other people, but this is made to order for the anti-gun crowd.
Of course, the criminal lawyers who are abusing the law this way are themselves to blame for the mis-use.
12
posted on
08/24/2006 2:32:28 PM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Fighting Irish
The article does not state whether or not the guns where legal, but it is probably a safe bet they weren't.
Even if he is charged for possession of an illegal firearm, what about the murder charge? The law does not seem to make an exception.
13
posted on
08/24/2006 2:32:33 PM PDT
by
KstoDC
To: KstoDC
"Unfortunately, you can't write a law that says only good citizens can use deadly force to protect themselves,'' Ahhh, but you can write a law that says only good citizens can legally own guns. I believe we already have quite a few.
These punks gave up the right to use guns, even in defense, when they turned to a life of crime.
14
posted on
08/24/2006 2:33:49 PM PDT
by
Gator101
To: KstoDC
The MSM in Fla has gone berserk since the passing of this law, making it sound like the streets are awash in blood.
They aren't; violent crime is actually down.
The so called "Stand Your Ground" law hasn't affected the laws regarding 'concealed carry' one bit.
15
posted on
08/24/2006 2:33:51 PM PDT
by
E8Ret
To: cripplecreek
I'm just making an assumption here but I'm guessing that neither Yello or Red are legal gun owners. Exactly.
The people who wrote this article haven't studied the issue.
16
posted on
08/24/2006 2:34:07 PM PDT
by
grundle
To: randog
"In June, unarmed Jason Rosenbloom was shot during an argument in Clearwater with his next-door neighbor."
"Well, he should have armed himself." - William "Bill" Munny
17
posted on
08/24/2006 2:35:07 PM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(Evil is an exact science)
To: KstoDC
18
posted on
08/24/2006 2:35:15 PM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
To: KstoDC
What's your opinion on this?
As you are a brand new user, I'm curious about your choice for a first post.
19
posted on
08/24/2006 2:35:24 PM PDT
by
TChris
(Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
To: KstoDC

Not the same guy. Just thought the nick of one of the thugs rang a bell.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson