Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has the Time Come for Passenger Mutinies?
The Reality Check ^ | 21 August 2006 | Sher Sieve

Posted on 08/23/2006 6:59:39 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln

As US Democrats and the worldwide leftist power elite continue to push their patently insane message “It’s better to die than to be politically incorrect”, an intrepid group of airline passengers finally decided to take matters into their own hands. In the early morning hours of Wednesday, 150 passengers scheduled to fly Monarch Airlines flight ZB 613 from Malaga to Manchester either refused to board or walked off their plane.

The reason for this unprecedented action? It appears that they didn’t think Wednesday was a particularly good day to die. As legal groups and airlines continue to balk at passenger profiling (in the United States the ACLU-CAIR Alliance calls it “unconstitutional”) and are still failing to check all passengers for newly banned items, these passengers became fed up. Instead, their collective group decided to perform its own profiling.

The passenger revolt is reported to have begun when two passengers, despite the intense heat, were observed in the waiting/boarding lounge wearing leather jackets, thick jumpers and were continually checking their watches. They were also talking to one another in what a passenger believed was an “Arabic language”. Apparently, six passengers initially refused to board the flight and then word spread to those already on board. One family, followed by the other boarded passengers, stood up and walked off the plane. The two passengers in dispute were eventually led off of the flight, the plane’s cabin was checked and cleared and it finally took off for its destination. The two men are said to have taken another flight, later in the day.

One of the passengers, college lecturer Jo Schofield who was flying with her family, said: “The plane was not yet full and it became apparent that people were refusing to board. In the gate waiting area, people had been talking about these two, who looked really suspicious with their heavy clothing, scruffy, rough, appearance and long hair. Some of the older children, who had seen the terror alert on television, were starting to mutter things like, 'Those two look like they're bombers’.”

A Tory Homeland Security spokesman Patrick Mercer blasted the passengers’ actions with: “This is a victory for terrorists. These people on the flight have been terrorized into behaving irrationally!” But, was their behavior irrational? Let’s take a look at history and a couple of recent events.

We already know that the 9/11 Islamic masterminds performed “trial runs” on the flights they eventually commandeered and used as missiles against the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and were attempting to fly Flight 93 into either the White House or the US Capitol building—before it was brought down by passengers and crashed into a Pennsylvania field. It is also strongly believed that these trial runs are continuing. The recently foiled UK terrorist plot was designed by al-Qaeda to explode and bring down at least ten US airline carriers—and all passengers—over the Atlantic Ocean. Two of the arrested terrorists, a man and a woman, purportedly admitted they planned to use one of their infant son’s formula bottles to store liquid explosives.

On 16 August a woman carried banned items, including a screwdriver, Vaseline and matches onto her flight. A note referring to al-Qaeda was also later discovered in the woman’s possession. Despite all warnings against banned items, she was allowed on board a flight bound from London’s Heathrow Airport to Washington DC. The woman’s aberrant in-flight behaviors eventually led to her being apprehended and taken down by other passengers. And Fox News’ Brian Wilson said that on two flights he took last week, passengers were allowed to take bottles filled with water (another recently banned item) onboard his flights. Wilson said that when he brought the items up to a flight attendant, he was advised that the airline employee saw ‘no problem with it’.

Personal Note: This flight attendant should be fired.

The larger issue, here, is that when even airline employees refuse to adhere to the newly-established safety rules, how are passengers supposed to protect themselves and their loved ones from the radical Islamic terrorist menace? Apparently, the head-in-the-sand syndrome has even spread to this most currently vulnerable airline industry. It appears that if “we the flying public” are going to be safe, no one but ourselves is going to save us. The hell with political correctness! We need more mutinies of this nature. It’s our money paying for these trips and, ultimately, our lives that are in jeopardy. If the airlines and our “PC” brethren don’t like it, I say “Then follow your own rules!”

I now doubt that anything will bring the so-called “moderate Muslims” out from their hiding places, in order to speak against their suicidal and homicidal brethren. But, at least a few, or many, more of these mutinies might just get the airlines to step up and listen. Contrary to politically-correct opinion, profiling is a good thing—at least if you want to have your best chance of remaining alive.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; democrats; left; leftists; liberals; libs; mutiny; passengerrevolt; pc; profiling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Lando Lincoln
I think a lot of people have "mutinied" in another way: they have quit flying. I no longer fly domestically, and doubt I'll ever take another overseas trip.

I'm a retired Colonel. For nearly 40 years I held either SECRET or TOP SECRET clearances. Yet I've been "selected" for secondary inspection, and am obviously on some kind of list, because on one flight the inspector asked me where my laptop was (I didn't take it on that particular flight).

Harassing me is sheer stupidity. Go after the likely bombers, not the rest of us.

21 posted on 08/23/2006 11:55:21 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (My book is out. Read excerpts at www.thejusticecooperative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke

"The flight attendant who refused to take the bottled water is a sane person in a terrorized world."

The new security rules are that NO bottled water shall be brought onto any airline flight. This flight attendant IGNORED the rules and should be fired.


22 posted on 08/25/2006 12:03:14 PM PDT by observer2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

I am a 74 yr. old white guy with a buzz haircut. I have sleep apnia. When I travel I always take my CPAP if it’s going to be overnight. I’m sure that by this time TSA people have seen thousands of them. But for some BS perverted reason, they act like it’s the first they’ve ever seen, going over it with a “sniffer” and wiping it with some ki.d of little pads...and once or more dragging me off to a private area and wanding me repeatedly. I never give them any static because I don’t want to miss my flight. But under my breath I am saying to myself what a bunch of useless, turdbrain drama pimps they are, Keystone Cop-ing it to make it appear that they actually amount to a fart in a tornado.


23 posted on 09/01/2013 4:45:02 PM PDT by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson