Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble
If I were bleeding (say: placental abruption) then yes that baby would need to come out. My point is that the baby would not need to be killed/ripped apart in order for it to be removed. There is no medical reason to kill the baby in order to save the mother.....if it were necessary to kill the baby then what do they do with the 'wanted' babies in the case of abruption? Those babies are born live.

'Maternal health' is just a way for the pro abortion crowd to try and justify late term partial birth abortions.
51 posted on 08/23/2006 6:11:08 PM PDT by socialismisinsidious ( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: socialismisinsidious; Jim Noble

"partial birth abortion" is entirely a different issue than having a surgeon trained in properly removing the baby in order to save the mothers life.

I honestly think this entire thing has been blown totally out of proportion.


54 posted on 08/23/2006 6:16:31 PM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson