ABC's 'The Path to 9/11' Is Outstanding

Human Events ^ | 8/22/06 | Govindini Murty

[TomGuy]

Bet the phone lines are burning up between Chappaqua and the ABC network suits in NYC.

I was thinking the same thing, especially after ABC trying and trying to get viewership for Commander in Chief .

[Common Tator]

Question...........why is anti-American, pro-Clinton ABC airing it?

Just the bottom line........i.e. MONEY?

People are often surprised to learn that the Sean Hannity Show is owned and distributed by ABC.

[ohioWfan]

Please read the article.

[Peach]

Thank you; if that was in the article, clearly I missed it.

But it's on my calendar now.

And may I suggest that freepers copy this article and send it out to family and friends in your e-mail group. This is must see tv.

And just before the election, we can show just how Clinton and the leftists hurt this country.

[ohioWfan]

I'm pretty sure ABC owns the whole world, Tator. :)

That's why the bottom line is obviously money. They don't give a rip about the country, that's for sure.....

[Peach]

Oh - it's in the first sentence and I missed it. Hitting head on keyboard.

[rabidralph]

Bump, for Truth and Freedom!

[OldFriend]

If you read Dereliction of Duty you will see that the story about permission to go after OBL was thwarted by slick willie at other times as well.

[OldFriend]

If you read the books written by those who were there you will be able to piece together the story of how X42 lost the WOT when it could have been stopped but had no courage nor inclination to go against the islamic fundamentalists for reasons we may never know.

My guess is that it always had to do with money.

[threeleftsmakearight]

ABC probably assumed the producer was "one of them" because he's Iranian.
That's why they're not promoting it too much.

[3catsanadog]

If the Hitlery gets elected, we might as well kiss security in this country goodbye. She'll all but give this country to our enemies.

[Bahbah]

Berger refuses to answer, and then finally just hangs up on the agent.

Pretty breathtaking, isn't it. And this is a man with whom this Administration's justice department struck a deal to return his security clearance after 3 years. I have never understood that.

[AJFavish]

Read Peter Lance's books:
www.peterlance.com

[Ragtop]

Yeah I realized that after the fact. I thought I read Mr. Murty at the end of the article, and then someone posted a pic of the author. And yes, she is hot.

[Bahbah]

they are having a write in campaign not to show it.

They spent $40 million on it, so I expect they will go ahead. The viewership will be huge. I can't believe this is ABC. I keep checking and rechecking.

[Ragtop]

Peter Jackson said he avoided putting any political viewpoint into the Lord of the Rings, which he said would have been easy to do. But he hates it when film makers do that. He just wanted to present the story and let it speak for itself.
I've noticed that when film makers do that, the content usually seems to be rather conservative. Lord of the Rings was a call to arms against an evil that wants nothing but your destruction. No negotiations, no compromises. Sound familiar?
The Battlestar Galatica series is the same way. They present both sides equally when their is a conflict between characters on that show. Watching it, I always think how much that show espouses conservative ideals.

[IncPen]

ping

[greyfoxx39]

Thanks for the ping, Howlin...will certainly watch.

[Aquinasfan]

They're on the verge of capturing Bin Laden, but they need final approval from the Clinton administration in order to go ahead. They phone Clinton, but he and his senior staff refuse to give authorization for the capture of Bin Laden, for fear of political fall-out if the mission should go wrong and civilians are harmed.

Imagine GW doing something similar. We don't have to imagine the MSM coverage, do we?

[IGOTMINE]

With extreme predjudice.