Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dallas To Consider Low Pants Ban
fox news dfw ^ | Aug 22, 2006

Posted on 08/23/2006 4:44:42 AM PDT by tuffydoodle

Dallas To Consider Low Pants Ban Last Edited: Tuesday, 22 Aug 2006, 6:51 PM CDT Created: Tuesday, 22 Aug 2006, 6:08 PM CDT

Some school districts ban pants like these that are low enough to expose underwear.

Related Items Stories Vote Here: Baggy Pants Poll

Poll Do you think baggy pants that expose underwear or skin below the hip should be banned from Dallas streets?

Poll Results: Yes 86% No 14% Total number of votes: 613 It's a fashion trend that for many is a fashion faux pas: baggin' and saggin' pants.

"I think it's a disgrace," said Dallas resident Von Lucky. "The women and all the people get to see it, the kids, whoever can walk up and see it."

Some sag so much you can see all of their boxer shorts. Others are so low that walking is waddling. Even in Dallas ISD schools where students must wear uniforms, the uniforms sag.

School board member Ron Price says he will ask the city council to make new rules regarding how low they can go.

"[Try to] pass an ordinance or strengthen the public lewdness law that we have, to include the language in regards to people wearing their pants below their buttocks exposing their underwear," said Price. "They should receive a ticket or citation."

City Councilman Steve Salazar says his Public Safety Committee will take a look.

"Our job is to look at it seriously," said Salazar, "and if it's something we think could help the community and could help as far as crime is concerned, we're going to take a look at it."

Such an ordinance would lead to more police contacts, say members of the DPD Gang Unit. "Anything that gives us a reason to make contact obviously helps us," said Lt. Carlton Marshall. "Especially if we can make contact with people we suspect are doing something they shouldn't be doing."

Aaron Wyatt wears his pants loose and low.

"Self expression, it's what I like doing, it's how I like dressing," said Wyatt. "It's comfortable for me, you know what I'm saying? So that's how I wear my pants, it's really how I've been wearing my pants ever since the little days."

"We're not trying to penalize people," said Price. "We're just asking people to be responsible citizens and show that they have respect for themselves and for others."

But Wyatt says being responsible has nothing to do with how high or low his pants ride. "Saggin' and baggin' is what we do down here in the South," he explained.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dresscodes; lowpants; pullyerpantsup; ugly; underwear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 08/23/2006 4:44:45 AM PDT by tuffydoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle

This fashion is all a conspiracy by the police to keep the little hoods from being able to run away without falling on their face. Did you ever see someone try to run in these?


2 posted on 08/23/2006 4:48:44 AM PDT by E.Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle
"Self expression, it's what I like doing, it's how I like dressing," said Wyatt. "It's comfortable for me, you know what I'm saying? So that's how I wear my pants, it's really how I've been wearing my pants ever since the little days." But Wyatt says being responsible has nothing to do with how high or low his pants ride. "Saggin' and baggin' is what we do down here in the South," he explained.

* nitwit ping *

3 posted on 08/23/2006 4:49:19 AM PDT by Condor 63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle

Know what I'm saying.


4 posted on 08/23/2006 4:49:48 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat

I hear ya.


5 posted on 08/23/2006 4:50:38 AM PDT by petercooper (Is this where I get me a huntin' license?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
City Councilman Steve Salazar says his Public Safety Committee will take a look.

I see.

6 posted on 08/23/2006 4:50:46 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle
I wear baggy cargo pants and shorts but I don't expose my underwear. What constitutes "low?" If its ultra-low jeans, yeah, that's already banned.

( No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

7 posted on 08/23/2006 4:52:40 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle

We are letting the terrorist win again.


8 posted on 08/23/2006 4:52:43 AM PDT by Perdogg (Democrats = terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E.Allen
Did you ever see someone try to run in these?

Yep. Twice as funny as watching them try to walk in them! They don't belong in the schools. In the event of a fire or other emergency, their baggy pants could hinder evacuation of a building. jmo

9 posted on 08/23/2006 4:53:09 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle

Could they apply this ordinance to plumbers as well?


10 posted on 08/23/2006 4:54:31 AM PDT by poobear (Political Left, continually accusing their foes of what THEY themselves do every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle

I always like how kids claim that they want to be individuals and show their own personal tastes, then they end up dresssing like all the rest.


11 posted on 08/23/2006 4:57:24 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle
"Saggin' and baggin' is what we do down here in the South," he explained.

Future Congressman or School Board member.

12 posted on 08/23/2006 4:57:59 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Tom Gallagher - the anti-Crist [FL Governor, 2006 primary])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
What constitutes "low?"

I think they mean like, when the pants only cover half of their butt or less.

Last year when I dropped our son off for school, this one student's pants were below his underwear. He had a long t-shirt on, but you could see the legs of his underpants and skin below that length, before the waistband of his pants.

13 posted on 08/23/2006 4:58:15 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

While they don't belong in schools or on the street, I feel what's even worse is having the state decide these matters.

Nanny state now at your dresser in the morning.


14 posted on 08/23/2006 4:59:23 AM PDT by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E.Allen

"This fashion is all a conspiracy by the police to keep the little hoods from being able to run away without falling on their face. Did you ever see someone try to run in these?"

Thank you for posting this. The inability to run after committing crime was the first thought. Didn't get around to the police conspiracy though. My beanie needs tuning!

Cheers,
Top sends


15 posted on 08/23/2006 4:59:39 AM PDT by petro45acp (SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG! ("On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs" by Dave Grossman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: poobear
Only if the plumber doesn't use this:
16 posted on 08/23/2006 5:00:28 AM PDT by fredhead (Women want me....Fish fear me....I can dream can't I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E.Allen

I believe I heard that this fashion first started in the prisons (prisoners without belts) and then migrated from the gangs to the streets.


17 posted on 08/23/2006 5:01:46 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. "--Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: diverteach
While they don't belong in schools or on the street, I feel what's even worse is having the state decide these matters.

Actually, if the school is Federally funded or getting money from the state, then the state just might have a voice in the matter.

18 posted on 08/23/2006 5:01:55 AM PDT by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte; pax_et_bonum; humblegunner; Bacon Man; Hap

"Saggin' and baggin'" ping.


19 posted on 08/23/2006 5:02:36 AM PDT by Allegra (RIP FReeper FLYER. You will be greatly missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle
Sometimes a little restraint is a good thing.


20 posted on 08/23/2006 5:05:12 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson