My antagonism is for the religious nutcases like Jim Jones and his kool aid drinking followers, the nutcases in the vatican who made galileo renounce his now proven to be true theories, the psychos of the spanish inquisition and the nuts who burned "heretics" at the stake
AND THE MORONS WHO ARE WILLING TO DO ANYTHING INCLUDING TO BASH EVOLUTION TO THE POINT WHERE THEY WANT TO LINK DARWIN TO HITLER.
Ummm I assume you think that Galileo was convicted of Heresy because he said the Earth went around the Sun and not the other way around?
First, Jim Jones was an atheist who used a fundamentalist preaching style to get his ideological message across (hmm . . . maybe that explains Al Sharpton . . . )
Second, how dare you attack the Catholic Church or anyone else under the sun other than redneck American Protestants? Everyone knows that it's all right for anyone else in the world to be a "fundie," to believe in "gxds" and spirits, in mythic origin stories, etc. (Next thing you'll be attacking the Australian aborigines! Don't you know they're better than the rest of us???) Only "rednecks" are to be attacked and ridiculed! I think there's a law about that somewhere . . .
AND THE MORONS WHO ARE WILLING TO DO ANYTHING INCLUDING TO BASH EVOLUTION TO THE POINT WHERE THEY WANT TO LINK DARWIN TO HITLER.
Since I am a Theonomic positivist, I don't try to discredit Darwin by linking him to Hitler because I don't believe that there is any "self-evident" objective moral standard whatsoever outside of G-d's "arbitrary" decrees. If I were to try to appeal to your groundless hang-ups about genocide (groundless because they are not based on your acceptance of "arbitrary" Divine decree) I would betray my Theonomic positivist position.
If there is not G-d, then everything is permitted . . . not just sexual sins, but everything. No objective moral standard can exist in an ultimately meaningless world despite the shallowness of our lamentable Hellenistic heritage.