Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Global-warming bill generates political heat
San Diego Union-Tribune (Copley) ^ | August 21, 2006 | Michael Gardner

Posted on 08/22/2006 11:28:55 AM PDT by calcowgirl

SACRAMENTO – Californians could eventually see subtle and dramatic innovations in grocery stores, new-car showrooms and kitchens if Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and leading Democrats agree on legislation aimed at slowing global warming.

Venture capitalists and entrepreneurs say a commitment from the state to regulate greenhouse gases would send a confidence-building signal to the marketplace, spurring a clean-tech revolution on par with the surge in high-tech and biotech that has helped drive California's economy.

Bill's highlights

Key elements of global warming measure AB 32:

• Requires businesses to roll back carbon dioxide emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, a potential 25 percent cut.

• Creates a state board to enact regulations on emissions.

• Allows businesses unable to meet requirements on-site to buy credits from other businesses that have not reached their limits.

• Suspends regulations in a natural disaster.

Unresolved issues:

• Should regulations be eased during an economic slump?

• Who should control a new oversight board?

• How much in-state credit should the state give to businesses that reduce emissions in other states and countries?

– Compiled by Michael Gardner

“Sustainable technologies are the next big thing. This is really the mother of all markets,” said John Doerr, a billionaire who helped launch Google, Intuit and the Segway scooter.

Unlike Doerr and other entrepreneurs who stand to make money off state-ordered clean technology, industries such as cement makers, utilities and manufacturers remain worried about emissions caps. The California Chamber of Commerce has warned that additional regulations would lead to a spike in energy prices and job losses.

“By placing an arbitrary carbon-emissions cap on California employers, we would be encouraging them to leave our state and take jobs to countries or states that do not impose caps,” said Allan Zaremberg, president of the state Chamber of Commerce. “When employers move to other global locations, they may produce even more carbon emissions.”

On Thursday, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved the legislation, Assembly Bill 32.

Most researchers agree that unchecked greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide, could disrupt global climate patterns, threaten crops, raise the risk of forest fires and shrink Sierra snowpacks that hold water for millions of Southern Californians. However, a few skeptics say the climate shifts have little to do with human emissions and may be part of historic weather patterns.

Schwarzenegger has made the issue a centerpiece of his environmental agenda as he runs for re-election, proposing a rollback of emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

Schwarzenegger's push puts him at odds with the state Chamber of Commerce, one of his closest allies. But other business interests are eager to see the measure pass, convinced that state regulations will prod demand for their energy-saving products, from hybrid cars to solar panels.

Doerr, who led a contingent of investors and entrepreneurs on a Capitol lobbying trip last week, said Californians should not be surprised to see big and small changes.

“Seven years ago, there was no Google. That's how fast Californians can change the world,” Doerr said.

Grocery stores already are starting to adapt by putting goods such as milk and eggs behind doors instead of in open refrigeration units. Time-of-use metering, common on farms and in other industries, may come to the kitchen and laundry room as power companies seek to discourage the use of large appliances by charging more during periods of peak energy demand.

California already has moved to push car makers to curb greenhouse gas emissions in their fleets starting with the 2009 models. Demand for hybrids such as the Toyota Prius and Honda Civic continues to outstrip production.

Moreover, said entrepreneur Felix Kramer, state-required reductions from all industries would spark investment interest in his venture, a hybrid car that plugs into a wall socket and gets the equivalent of 100 miles per gallon of gas.

“It's important to have a long-term market and stable demand. That's what we need,” Kramer said. “The legislation and regulations will provide that.”

The endorsement of leading entrepreneurs with a stake in clean-air technologies has helped shift the debate and has handed business-friendly Democrats a reason to support the legislation in an election year.

“It's bringing new voices to the fight. When you have new voices, it makes good political sense to exercise them,” said Ann Notthoff, state advocacy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Schwarzenegger appears confident that a compromise bill will reach his desk before the Legislature ends its session for the year by the end of the month.

“There will be some environmentalists who say this is not perfect and there will be other people in the business community who will say this is not perfect,” Schwarzenegger said Wednesday. “For us, the challenge is to prove that we can protect the environment and also protect the economy at the same time.”

That may be impossible, economist Margo Thorning said. She argued that fuel prices will soar as utilities and refiners recoup their investment in reducing emissions. In turn, consumers and businesses will squeeze their spending to pay higher energy bills.

“People don't have unlimited resources,” Thorning said.

However, a recent study by the University of California Berkeley concluded that California's economy will see a net gain in jobs amid an injection of new investment in technology.

Although Democrats and the governor are in agreement on a broad framework, they remain split on three major points: how much industry should be allowed to buy pollution credits elsewhere to meet required targets, what powers to grant a regulatory agency and how to temporarily relieve businesses of obligations in a natural or economic disaster.

Environmentalists say California is positioned to show the way nationally, leading to lowered expenses as more technology comes to the market.

“The entire country is looking to California to lead,” said Jim Marston, an Environmental Defense attorney involved in global warming issues nationally.

Business generally agrees on that point. But Kevin Fay, who represents a consortium of large corporations that included DuPont, Boeing and General Electric, called the legislation “a big gamble.”

“No economy this size,” Fay said, “has gone it alone in the world.”


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ab32; callegislation; capandtrade; elections; globalwarming; johndoerr; schwarzenegger

1 posted on 08/22/2006 11:28:56 AM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Like they don't have enough to worry about in California. Now they're gonna cure us of global warming which may or may not exist.

What a bunch of goofballs.


2 posted on 08/22/2006 11:30:56 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

As if we need more reasons to leave...


3 posted on 08/22/2006 11:33:16 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Californians could eventually see subtle and dramatic innovations in grocery stores, new-car showrooms and kitchens if Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and leading Democrats agree on legislation aimed at slowing global warming.

They'll see "dramatic" and "innovative" pricing too since all this needless crap costs big bucks. You and I will pay and pay.

4 posted on 08/22/2006 11:33:33 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Here's how we cut in half "greenhouse gasses" in California: require proof of citizenship to purchase gasoline.


5 posted on 08/22/2006 11:35:00 AM PDT by Restore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
The reason the venture capitalists are for it is that someone else gets to foot the bill while they reap the profits. And their assets are liquid, if it gets too onerous to do business in California, they can move without too much expense. What they're pushing for is a good deal for them even if it amounts to a straitjacket upon California's economy as a whole.

( No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

6 posted on 08/22/2006 11:36:57 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
...if Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and leading Democrats agree on legislation aimed at slowing global warming showboating and grandstanding.

There.
I fixed it.

If, as I believe, global warming is real and a natural cycle, all the wealth in the world will fail to "solve" or even "slow" anything. Adapt? Perhaps.
Might as well create legislation eliminating tides; or volcanoes; or tornadoes; or...

7 posted on 08/22/2006 11:50:57 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
This should be a big economic boon to other states as businesses exit to more friendly places. The only people anxious for this legislation are those who hope to feed at the taxpayers trough to fund new technology that doesn't make any difference in the "global warming" issue. Even a full fledged compiance with Kyoto would make less than a 1% change in overall emissions, but would blow a huge economic hole in participating economies.
8 posted on 08/22/2006 11:54:38 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
That's why I call it the California Economy Shutdown Act Of 2006. I'm just stating honestly what the MSM and the politicians won't tell you.

( No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

9 posted on 08/22/2006 11:57:14 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
That's why I call it the California Economy Shutdown Act Of 2006. I'm just stating honestly what the MSM and the politicians won't tell you.

( No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

10 posted on 08/22/2006 11:57:23 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
So little gain for all the heat generated... which so far appears to be more political than atmospheric in nature.

( No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

11 posted on 08/22/2006 11:58:47 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
My personal opinion is that this is a completely natural cycle. Nothing we do can change it. What we can do is adapt our living practices before the changes have a significant impact. Move the agricultural activity to a location that will be more suitable in the warmer scenario.
12 posted on 08/22/2006 11:59:18 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
That's why I call it the California Economy Shutdown Act Of 2006

Yes, it will shutdown the California economy and the crazy ninth supreme court would uphold it. Bye Bye California.

13 posted on 08/22/2006 11:59:18 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Lots of hot air coming from Sacramento. Too bad we can't harvest it for something useful.
14 posted on 08/22/2006 12:00:36 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Notice: "Sustainable" is the latest code-word for socialist.
15 posted on 08/22/2006 12:01:43 PM PDT by TChris (Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

What next? Will California regulate farts?


16 posted on 08/22/2006 12:03:24 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (You! Shake your junk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

they are trying in the central valley.. cow farts no less


17 posted on 08/22/2006 1:01:49 PM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan; calcowgirl
"“People don't have unlimited resources,” Thorning said."

This lady economist has it exactly right! These brain-dead billionaires all start thinking that that their big bank account is a substitute for brains!!! Trouble is, so do all the celebrity worshippers and now we've got both in CA... celebrity swooners and billionairhead worshippers.

One thing the celebrities and billionaires both know... If ya can't dazzle 'em with yer brilliance, ya can always baffle 'em with yer bool chit!!! All this, is exactly THAT!!!

Everybody just assumes that billionaires are automatic geniuses!!! It just isn't true! These dudes put their pants on one leg at a time exactly like the rest of us!!! They may have made it with persistence and determination, the two key ingredients, but not always with brains... Judas Priest!!!

18 posted on 08/22/2006 2:13:49 PM PDT by SierraWasp (I'm voting on everything except CA Governor this year cause there's NOTHING to vote "for"!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson