Skip to comments.
Bush Backs Access to "Morning-After" Pill for Minors: Pro-lifers Say President Is Inconsistent
Zenit ^
| 8/21/2006
Posted on 08/21/2006 8:04:37 PM PDT by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
The President not coming out 100% against this abortifacient is very, very disappointing to me. I hope he thinks about it and returns to his pro-life policies.
To: Coleus; cpforlife.org; Pyro7480; Salvation; Mrs. Don-o
disappointed pro-life ping?
2
posted on
08/21/2006 8:05:52 PM PDT
by
markomalley
(Vivat Iesus!)
To: markomalley
The checks from the pharmaceutical industry to the RNC must have cleared.
3
posted on
08/21/2006 8:09:06 PM PDT
by
KoRn
To: markomalley
This is typical MSM spin. Don't believe it. Bush wants to restrict Plan B from being freely given to teens without parental notification.
4
posted on
08/21/2006 8:09:14 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning)
To: Responsibility2nd
More accurate headlines:
Bush supports limits on morning-after pill
WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - President George W. Bush said on Monday he supports restricting access to emergency contraception for minors, as regulators weigh wider access to the "morning-after" pill.
So is he for it or against it?
5
posted on
08/21/2006 8:13:29 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning)
To: markomalley
President Bush will not Abandon the Pro-Life Movement and approve Plan B.
To: Responsibility2nd
This is typical MSM spin. No offense, but Zenit is HARDLY MSM.
7
posted on
08/21/2006 8:14:41 PM PDT
by
markomalley
(Vivat Iesus!)
To: trumandogz
Bush can't approve or disapprove any type of medication. That is the job of the FDA.
8
posted on
08/21/2006 8:15:54 PM PDT
by
COEXERJ145
(Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
To: markomalley
One of the most amusing things about this entire controversy is watching the moonbats wrestle their hatred of pharmaceuticals vs their desire for free abortion on demand.
That said, I don't have a particular problem with the sale of this pill.
9
posted on
08/21/2006 8:16:42 PM PDT
by
zendari
To: Responsibility2nd
10
posted on
08/21/2006 8:16:43 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: zendari
That said, I don't have a particular problem with the sale of this pill.Agreed.
11
posted on
08/21/2006 8:17:47 PM PDT
by
Wormwood
(Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
To: markomalley
..... Father Thomas Euteneuer, president of Human Life International, as saying: "President Bush's implied support for the abortion-causing drug Plan B is completely inconsistent with his recent veto of the embryonic stem cell research [ESCR] funding bill. What the president apparently fails to realize is that Plan B kills the same innocent unborn children that the ESCR process does." "President Bush is showing inconsistency in his support for life."
Not a good move Dubya.
12
posted on
08/21/2006 8:19:52 PM PDT
by
Reagan Man
(Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
To: markomalley
Remember, George Bush is a "compassionate conservative." Translation, "I support conservative causes when I feel like it."
13
posted on
08/21/2006 8:20:20 PM PDT
by
BW2221
To: Responsibility2nd
This is typical MSM spin. Don't believe it. Bush wants to restrict Plan B from being freely given to teens without parental notification. That's what I was thinking ... Bush isn't banning Plan B, or calling for a ban on prescribing it to minors. That is tragic, but I think his comments are made in the context of the abortifacient being made available without a prescription. That means unfettered access for everyone, including minors. Bush is clearly opposing that. That is a significantly different meaning than the MSM is attaching to this. Stir that pot, media libs!
14
posted on
08/21/2006 8:21:15 PM PDT
by
GenXFreedomFighter
(We smirked our way back for a second term!)
To: markomalley
That's it, I'm voting for Hillary. /s
15
posted on
08/21/2006 8:23:50 PM PDT
by
JHBowden
(Speaking truth to moonbat.)
To: Responsibility2nd
He still wants it out in the marketplace and available with a doctors prescription to minors.
That's what's wrong about the President's position although its not enough for Hillary who wants teenagers to pick it up over the counter.
16
posted on
08/21/2006 8:27:54 PM PDT
by
Nextrush
(Chris Matthews Band: "I get high...... I get high.....I get high.....McCain.")
To: markomalley
Hmmm....second term lame-duck Republicans never fail to disappoint....
17
posted on
08/21/2006 8:30:31 PM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
(Colossians 2:6)
To: Nextrush
"I believe that Plan B ... ought to require a prescription for minors. That's what I believe," Bush said at a news conference today. So how do you read that Bush wants minors to have prescription free access??????
18
posted on
08/21/2006 8:32:04 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning)
To: Nextrush
Sorry, I read your post too fast. Please disregard my post #18.
19
posted on
08/21/2006 8:33:27 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning)
To: JHBowden
There is weakness here in the President's position and I don't mind saying it although I'm no Hillary supporter.
What I do know is that one politician in my area who is now county chairman of the GOP here put it this way. "I oppose abortion but support birth control."
I think that's the game GOP politicians are playing because big-time money supports Planned Parenthood and they are getting around surgical abortions by pushing Plan B.
In some cases Plan B performs a chemical abortion that's less visibly offensive (no body parts) than surgical abortion. Its something that rich RINO contributors to the GOP want in my town and everywhere else.
20
posted on
08/21/2006 8:36:51 PM PDT
by
Nextrush
(Chris Matthews Band: "I get high...... I get high.....I get high.....McCain.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson