I don't pretend potential people are the same as REAL people. How beastly of me.
Guililani would win NY, IL, MI, NJ, CN, CA, PA, WS as well as every state that Bush won. He would win in a landslide while you sulk and pretend to be righteous.
Dear justshutupandtakeit,
"I don't pretend potential people are the same as REAL people."
I see the problem. You're one of those folks who denies the humanity of those who haven't yet been born. All this time, I thought I was conversing with a Republican and a conservative. My error.
I think that perhaps you're in the wrong party. The Party of Satan can be found at DemocraticUnderground.
"How beastly of me."
Indeed. It's good that you have at least that much insight into the problem. ;-)
"Guililani would win NY, IL, MI, NJ, CN, CA, PA, WS as well as every state that Bush won."
I don't think so. For example, Pennsylvania is a tough nut to crack for Republicans. You've got a lot of old union and Catholic Democrats who are nearly Democrat genetically. But a lot of these ethnic white Democrats, union and Catholic, are also social conservatives. Pro-life, pro-guns, anti-homosexualist agenda. Lots of them are iffy on "tax cuts for the wealthy," "war for oil," etc. But many of them also feel uncomfortable voting for pro-abort Democrats, as well.
Run a pro-abort Republican, and you've assuaged their consciences when they vote Democrat.
The analysis isn't quite as straightforward as you suggest.
sitetest
I like a clear declaration. That is one. Thanks
That lines up straight as an arrow with the Dem position on the issue.
Uh, how big a tent are you trying to pitch? Careful...the whole thing might fall on your head.
While I think your position on this is indeed beastly, I must give you credit for at least being honest about your pro-abortion views. I have no doubt that most of the Guiliani fans around here are in the same boat as you but don't have the courage to admit it on such a pro-life forum.