Dear justshutupandtakeit,
"I don't pretend potential people are the same as REAL people."
I see the problem. You're one of those folks who denies the humanity of those who haven't yet been born. All this time, I thought I was conversing with a Republican and a conservative. My error.
I think that perhaps you're in the wrong party. The Party of Satan can be found at DemocraticUnderground.
"How beastly of me."
Indeed. It's good that you have at least that much insight into the problem. ;-)
"Guililani would win NY, IL, MI, NJ, CN, CA, PA, WS as well as every state that Bush won."
I don't think so. For example, Pennsylvania is a tough nut to crack for Republicans. You've got a lot of old union and Catholic Democrats who are nearly Democrat genetically. But a lot of these ethnic white Democrats, union and Catholic, are also social conservatives. Pro-life, pro-guns, anti-homosexualist agenda. Lots of them are iffy on "tax cuts for the wealthy," "war for oil," etc. But many of them also feel uncomfortable voting for pro-abort Democrats, as well.
Run a pro-abort Republican, and you've assuaged their consciences when they vote Democrat.
The analysis isn't quite as straightforward as you suggest.
sitetest
People are not the same as potential people. All potential people are not even born even without an abortionist's intervention.
PA would not be a "tough nut" for Guiliani. It would be a cakewalk.
Don't criticize my analysis when yours is just your wishes.