Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: umgud

This law has become so abused. When did Judges start ruling on feelings instead of facts?


6 posted on 08/20/2006 9:04:54 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: CindyDawg
When did Judges start ruling on feelings instead of facts?

When did the first group of humans select one amongst them to settle disputes???

10 posted on 08/20/2006 9:08:20 PM PDT by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CindyDawg

Now, now -- they don't just rule on feelings, they also bring in penumbras and emanations.


11 posted on 08/20/2006 9:10:26 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CindyDawg
When did Judges start ruling on feelings instead of facts?

When Congress passed hate crime laws, which are nothng but feelings which have become criminal. I know that is not the same as the feelings of the judge but that is part of the same legal confusion.

21 posted on 08/20/2006 9:28:44 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CindyDawg
The Revenue Act of 1764, also known as the Sugar Act, was the first tax on the American colonies imposed by the British Parliament. Its purpose was to raise revenue through the colonial customs service and to give customs agents more power and latitude with respect to executing seizures and enforcing customs law. That the Act came from an external body rather than a colonial legislature alarmed a handful of colonial leaders in Boston who held that the Act violated their “British privileges”. Their principle complaint was against taxation without representation. Just as important, however, were the Act’s profound implications for the colonial judicial system, for the Revenue Act of 1764 allowed British officers to try colonists who violated the new duties at a new Vice-Admiralty court in Halifax, Nova Scotia, thus depriving the colonists of their right to trial by a jury of their peers. The seriousness of this was not lost on the Massuchusetts Legislature: “The extension of the powers of the courts of vice-admiralty has, so far as the jurisdiction of the said courts hath been extended, deprived the colonies of one of the most valuable of English liberties, trials by juries” (Petition from the Massachusetts Legislature to the House of Commons, 3 November 1764). The Act also established new trial procedures which essentially freed customs officers from all responsibility and from effective civil suits for damages in colonial courts. While a handful of colonial leaders recognized the grave implications of the Revenue Act, it was not until news of the Stamp Act reached the colonies that the seeds of rebellion were planted in the hearts and minds of the broader public.
24 posted on 08/20/2006 9:33:36 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Hezbollah: Habitat for Humanity with an attitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CindyDawg
"This law has become so abused. When did Judges start ruling on feelings instead of facts?"

When we let the government tell us we were not capable of deciding for ourselves what we can put in to our own bodies, that's when.

119 posted on 08/21/2006 1:58:50 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CindyDawg

about 35 years ago.


145 posted on 08/21/2006 4:28:17 AM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson