Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With doublespeaking France, honor gets lost in translation
Boston Herald ^ | August 20, 2006 | Jules Crittenden

Posted on 08/20/2006 1:39:42 PM PDT by John Jorsett

French is the traditional language of diplomacy. Diplomacy is the art of saying one thing while doing another.

In recent weeks, France stepped forward to act as a broker of peace in Lebanon. “Act” is the key verb in that last sentence, as it now would seem that the only other verifiable part of the sentence is “in recent weeks.”

To correctly parse that sentence, one must understand that when France suggested it wanted to broker peace in Lebanon, it did not necessarily mean “broker” or “peace” or “Lebanon” in the way we might understand those words. The same is true when France further suggested it wanted to “lead” a “strong” “multinational” “force” there.

I don’t speak French, so I have no idea what the actual French words are for those concepts or what possible nuances there may be. I’ve been relying on news reports in English, which now inform me that the French do not intend to send any significant number of troops to what is supposed to be a force of 15,000 in Lebanon, like everyone thought they said they would.

The heady moment of peace brokering having passed, uponsober reflection, the French now say they already have a general and some staff in south Lebanon ordering about UNIFIL, the U.N. monitoring entity there. That’s plenty of leadership, the French suggested: All France needs to contribute now is another 200 combat engineers.

In tactical terms, when it comes to securing a Middle East conflict zone, that can be referred to as “squat.”

The United Nations, which is trying to salvage what is left of its own self-respect after the utter failure of UNIFIL in Lebanon, is now publicly begging European nations to contribute troops.

To find the last plain-speaking French leader, it is necessary to go back to Napoleon Bonaparte. He said he was going to take over Europe, and proceeded to do so. No, scratch that. He said he was going to bring French liberty and equality to Europe, then crowned himself emperor. Subsequent French history offers us a sordid string of third world colonizations followed by bloody wars to hang on long after the time to relinquish colonies had passed, setting the stage for corrupt government and prolonged conflict in places like Vietnam.

More recently, we’ve seen the naked hypocrisy of Dominic de Villepin in the United Nations, braying about his humanitarian concerns for the Iraqi people, while trying to ensure mass murderer Saddam Hussein remained in power to honor his French contracts.

The shamelessness of France knows no bounds. They have a domestic Arabic population and business interests in the Mideast to satisfy. They desperately want to be taken seriously as a major power. So they sat down with the United States and hammered out a peace plan. Then, before the ink was dry, they shrugged a Gallic shrug.

I wish I could be charitable here and find some good excuses for the French. Ernest Hemingway, who had a soft spot for them, used to like to say, “Always do sober what you said you’d do drunk.” But Hemingway, unlike the French, had a sense of honor.

French was once the lingua franca, back when men wore powdered wigs and France was a power to be reckoned with. None of those things are true now. French has been replaced by English as the language of foreign policy, business, tourism, the Internet and just about everything else.

If we, those of us who enjoy conducting business in English rather than say, Chinese or Arabic, want it to stay that way, I’d suggest step one is that we should continue to state clearly our intentions and do what we say we aregoing to do. Even when the world doesn’t necessarily like what we are saying.

That is our French lesson for the day.


TOPICS: Editorial; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; france; geopolitics; un

1 posted on 08/20/2006 1:39:42 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

Now I can understand Kerry speak, first I voted for the *0 billion.....


2 posted on 08/20/2006 1:45:48 PM PDT by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

I can understand this waffling.

It is when France cowers and changes her mind that the Alsatian in me becomes German. Usually, it's French.

I think it's in the genes.

But, I haven't surrendered to anyone lately. ~Maybe tomorrow.


3 posted on 08/20/2006 1:50:19 PM PDT by OpusatFR ( ALEA IACTA EST. We have just crossed the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

My sentiments exactly...we should at least sever diplomatic ties with France for a while to show our displeasure.


4 posted on 08/20/2006 2:01:10 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett

Q. How many French troops does it take to defend Paris?

A. Nobody knows; it's never been tried.


5 posted on 08/20/2006 2:17:51 PM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I don’t speak French, so I have no idea what the actual French words are for those concepts or what possible nuances there may be.

I do; speak French, Fluently, my parents having emigrated from Montreal.

The first three are easy: Broker=négocier (negotiate) or traiter, which is to make a deal.

Peace is paix and Lebanon is Lebanon.

As far as “lead,” “strong” or “force,” I'm afraid I've never heard those words spoken in French. They don't exist. /sarc.

Now, the opposites are well known to all Franco's: follow=suivre weak=faible and the most oft used word in the French lexicon, "SURRENDER"=céder

6 posted on 08/20/2006 2:26:30 PM PDT by seasoned traditionalist (ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS, BUT ALL TERRORISTS WHO WANT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY, ARE MUSLIMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
France, Honor used in the same line???

who they kidding??

7 posted on 08/20/2006 3:42:24 PM PDT by GeronL (flogerloon.blogspot.com -------------> Rise of the Hate Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Recently seen ad on ebay:

"For Sale. One French Army rifle. Like New! Never fired!! Dropped only once. Make offer."


8 posted on 08/20/2006 5:33:08 PM PDT by Mtner77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. also

2006israelwar or WOT

..................

9 posted on 08/21/2006 7:13:02 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Actually, the French defended PAris even after losing the Franco-Prussian war.
In Wolrd War One over 1 million French were killed or crippled defending their country. France has never recovered.
10 posted on 08/21/2006 5:30:11 PM PDT by rmlew (I'm a Goldwater Republican... Don Goldwater 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson