Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lieberman insists he is "devoted" Democrat
Reuters ^ | August 20, 2006 | Steve Grudgings

Posted on 08/20/2006 11:43:07 AM PDT by Dane

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Sen. Joseph Lieberman, seeking to slip out of a perceived White House embrace, insisted on Sunday he was a loyal Democrat and criticized the Bush administration's post-invasion Iraq war policy.

The 2000 vice-presidential candidate lost the Democratic primary vote in Connecticut to an anti-war rival this month, but is now running for re-election as an independent candidate in a contest that has exposed deep U.S. divisions over the unpopular war.

Some Republican officials have shifted their support to Lieberman, and the White House took the rare step of declining to back the Republican nominee, leading critics to accuse him of becoming the de-facto candidate for President George W. Bush.

Lieberman, who according to a poll released last week now leads the Senate race in the Democrat-leaning state, said in an interview on CBS television that he was "devoted" to his party and would remain in its congressional caucus if elected.

"I am a Democrat. Look at my voting record - I voted 90 percent of the time with the majority of Democrats in the United States' Senate," he said.

However, he said, "I feel I allowed my opponent to distort my position on Iraq," he said. "What I mean is he made me into a cheerleader for George Bush on everything that's happened."

Lieberman reiterated his call for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to resign due to setbacks in Iraq and said that despite his own support for overthrowing Saddam Hussein, he thinks Bush has mishandled Iraq policy after the invasion.

"I've been very critical over the years, particularly in 2003 and 2004 about the failure to send enough American troops to secure the country," he said.

But he said there would be all-out civil war and a "disaster we pay for a generation" if Washington sets a deadline for a troop withdrawal from Iraq, a call that helped his Democrat rival Ned Lamont win the primary vote.

"The position that my opponent and others take to set a deadline by which we will get out is the surest way to get to a civil war, which would be dangerous for our troops, a disaster for Iraq, the Middle East and for the United States of America."

He said the president and Congress may need to consider a troop withdrawal in the event of "all-out" civil war in Iraq.

Leading Democrats said the senator's defeat showed voters' anger at Bush and the war ahead of November mid-term elections, while Republican and administration officials have painted it as an example of Democratic weakness on national security.

Democratic party Chairman Howard Dean has called for Lieberman to drop out after his primary loss.

Lieberman's decision to shrug off the defeat and run as an independent has ensured the war will stay in the election spotlight as Democrats try to wrest control of the House and the Senate from Bush's Republican Party


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: congress; ct; donkeyparty; election2006; jackassparty; lamont; liberals; lieberman; moronparty; poll; rats; republicans; socialists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
Hey Joe, did al gore call you up and say you will be his running mate for another election loss in 2008.
1 posted on 08/20/2006 11:43:07 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dane

I guess he wants to get elected with Dem votes instead of GOP votes.


2 posted on 08/20/2006 11:44:05 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

CONNECTICUT CONSERVATIVES:
DON'T VOTE FOR JOE LIEBERMAN!



3 posted on 08/20/2006 11:45:16 AM PDT by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Say good bye to Joe.

Only a Democrat could win an election with such wishy-washy rhetoric and since he lost the primary....

4 posted on 08/20/2006 11:46:53 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

I believe Lieberman -- he is a "devoted" Democrat. Too bad many Republicans have willfully deceived themselves about him


5 posted on 08/20/2006 11:49:31 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Hey Joe, did al gore call you up and say you will be his running mate for another election loss in 2008.

It couldn't be for as slow as AlGore talks Joe would still be on the phone waiting for him to finish his statement.

6 posted on 08/20/2006 11:49:31 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

He has to run to the left in this race.

I don't care if he loses. He's no friend of conservatives in the best of times.

It's a choice in this race between awful and horrible. Who cares?


7 posted on 08/20/2006 11:49:44 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Well, "pecunia non olet", and so do votes. How will "votes" be in Latin?


8 posted on 08/20/2006 11:51:01 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
You forget that there is a Republican in that race. At least, we may help the party to reach a good percentage.
9 posted on 08/20/2006 11:52:12 AM PDT by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
How will "votes" be in Latin?

"suffragium, -ii"

10 posted on 08/20/2006 11:54:49 AM PDT by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Some Republican officials have shifted their support to Lieberman, and the White House took the rare step of declining to back the Republican nominee...

Kind of like the WH supporting Specter over Toomey except a little different. Bastidges.

FMCDH(BITS)

11 posted on 08/20/2006 11:55:46 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977
I've hardly heard anything about that Republican. Seems he would have a good chance with the Democrats splitting the vote.
12 posted on 08/20/2006 11:56:08 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

The polls suggest he would have less than 10% of votes, but we may help me anyway.


13 posted on 08/20/2006 11:58:10 AM PDT by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

I wonder what Sean "you're a real ammmmmerican" will say about this? Oh my, and Rumsfeld gotta go too! Fool me once.....ROTFLMAO


14 posted on 08/20/2006 12:04:25 PM PDT by tommyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977

Thanks. Then, "suffragii non olet".


15 posted on 08/20/2006 12:07:18 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977

You may be right. Lamont is as dense as Jay Rockefeller, another rich kid. and I doubt that he will have the casting ballot in any decision to defeund the war.


16 posted on 08/20/2006 12:07:53 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
I've hardly heard anything about that Republican. Seems he would have a good chance with the Democrats splitting the vote.

Alan Schlesinger

Caveat emptor, since it's a wikopedia entry. Still, this guy sounds like he's no prize.

I think I'd rather see the Moron.org-types get a nice bloody nose from Lieberman, then see this dork get 10% of the vote instead of 6%.

Yeah, I know, Lieberman is a liberal. So what. when it comes to the WOT, I'd take Lieberman over Hagel or Chaffee.
17 posted on 08/20/2006 12:07:53 PM PDT by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Attn: Sean Hannity. Quit sucking up to Loserman.

He's no friend of conservatism.

18 posted on 08/20/2006 12:09:44 PM PDT by Bullish ( The pig headed monkeys of Islam can kiss my grits!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Joe LIEberman ~ Sean Hannity's kind of guy!


19 posted on 08/20/2006 12:14:11 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tommyboy
As pompous as Hannity has become, I enjoy the show more when he's off and another conservative "pinch hits." It would be even better on a night when both Hannity and Colmes were on vacation.
20 posted on 08/20/2006 12:16:48 PM PDT by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson